Peer Feedback Training in L2 English Writing: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Studies from 2016 to 2025
Keywords:
EFL writing; feedback literacy; L2 English writing; peer feedback training; systematic literature reviewAbstract
Although peer feedback has been widely used in second language (L2) English writing instruction, its pedagogical value is often constrained by vague comments, limited understanding of evaluation criteria, low learner confidence, weak peer trust, and insufficient uptake of revision. Guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework, this systematic literature review identified and synthesized empirical studies published from 2016 to 2025 on peer feedback training in English as a Foreign Language and English as a Second Language writing contexts. Database searches in Scopus, Educational Resources Information Center, and Web of Science were followed by deduplication, title and abstract screening, full-text eligibility assessment, and quality appraisal. Nineteen empirical studies were included in a narrative thematic synthesis focusing on instructional design, reported learning outcomes, and implementation challenges. The synthesis suggests that peer feedback is more effective when supported by rubrics or checklists, teacher modeling, guided peer-review tools, peer dialogue, AI-supported scaffolding, and revision-reflection tasks. Reported outcomes included improvements in feedback quality, revision uptake, writing performance, feedback literacy, motivation, self-efficacy, engagement, and self-regulated writing. Recurring implementation challenges included uneven learner readiness, limited feedback specificity, insufficient peer trust, time constraints, and the need for teacher monitoring and systematic guidance. Based on these findings, the review proposes a lightweight peer feedback training framework for L2 writing instruction and future intervention research.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.7.23
References
Awada, G. M., & Diab, N. M. (2023). Effect of online peer review versus face-to-face peer review on argumentative writing achievement of EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1–2), 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1912104
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Campbell, C. W., & Batista, B. (2023). To peer or not to peer: A controlled peer-editing intervention measuring writing self-efficacy in South Korean higher education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100218
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., Gai, X., Jiang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2021). Effects of trained peer vs. teacher feedback on EFL students’ writing performance, self-efficacy, and internalization of motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 788474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.788474
Deng, Y., & Sitthitikul, P. (2025). The effects of the guided dialogic peer feedback-based writing instruction on Chinese EFL students’ writing performance in an integrated blended learning environment. rEFLections, 32(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i1.277804
Do, H. M. (2024). E-peer feedback training on L2 writing: A case study of inexperienced learners. The JALT CALL Journal, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v20n1.1242
Ghaneiarani, S., Alavi, S. M., & Kaivanpanah, S. (2024). Enhancing writing ability of Iranian EFL learners through learning-oriented assessment: Peer and teacher feedback implementation. Language Testing in Asia, 14, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00298-w
Guo, K., Pan, M., Li, Y., & Lai, C. (2024). Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students’ feedback quality and writing ability. The Internet and Higher Education, 63, 100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962
Guo, K., Zhang, E. D., Li, D., & Yu, S. (2025). Using AI-supported peer review to enhance feedback literacy: An investigation of students’ revision of feedback on peers’ essays. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(4), 1612–1639. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13540
Hanh, L. T. T., & Tinh, B. T. (2022). Applying peer-review checklist to improve Vietnamese EFL university students’ writing skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(5), 166–181. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.5.9
Hassani, J. B., Chalak, A., & Heidari Tabrizi, H. (2023). Investigating the effect of synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated peer feedback on IELTS candidates’ writing development and interactions. Education and Self Development, 18(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.1.03
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Leong, L. V., Yunus, M. M., & Ismail, H. H. (2024). Integration of techno-pedagogical approach in English as a second language classroom: A systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(6), 4394–4408. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i6.29976
Lin, C.-J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2025). Artificial intelligence-supported procedural scaffolding for promoting EFL learners’ writing performance in flipped peer assessment activities. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2532629
Liu, F., & Luo, W. (2025). Exploring the effects of online peer feedback on tertiary students’ peer feedback literacy in English writing: Focusing on design elements. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 87, 101516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101516
Min, H.-T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003
Min, H.-T. (2016). Effect of teacher modeling and feedback on EFL students’ peer review skills in peer review training. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.004
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Ramalingam, S., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Blended learning strategies for sustainable English as a second language education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(13), 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138051
Sun, H., & Wang, M. (2025). Effects of teacher intervention and type of peer feedback on student writing revision. Language Teaching Research, 29(3), 1094–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221080507
Tan, S. Y., & Yunus, M. M. (2023). Sustaining English language education with social networking sites (SNSs): A systematic review. Sustainability, 15(7), 5710. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075710
Tran, T. T. T., & Ma, Q. (2024). Online peer feedback training based on self-regulated learning in English as a foreign language writing: Perceived usefulness and students’ engagement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101418
Van den Bos, A. H., & Tan, E. (2019). Effects of anonymity on online peer review in second-language writing. Computers & Education, 142, 103638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638
Weng, F., Zhao, C. G., & Chen, S. (2024). Effects of peer feedback in English writing classes on EFL students’ writing feedback literacy. Assessing Writing, 61, 100874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100874
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538
Yingbao, L., Ismail, H. H., & Yunus, M. M. (2025). Teaching pedagogies using ICT in university academic English writing across the globe – A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(3), 656–678. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.3.31
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000161
Zhang, X., & Yu, S. (2022). Training student writers in conducting peer feedback in L2 writing: A meaning-making perspective. Applied Linguistics Review, 13(4), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0045
Zheng, Q. (2025). Promoting draft revision motivation and quality through technology-enhanced peer feedback workshops. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73, 1225–1243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10450-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jing Wang, Melor Md Yunus, Nur Ainil Sulaiman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
