A Systematic Review of Blended Learning in Higher Education: Second Language Acquisition through the Community of Inquiry Framework
Keywords:
Systematic review, Community of Inquiry, blended learning, second language acquisition, higher education PRISMAAbstract
This study examined the application of the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework in blended learning environments for second language acquisition in higher education. A systematic literature review was conducted using the PRISMA protocol, analyzing 25 peer-reviewed articles published between 2014 and 2023 from Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC databases. The review investigated CoI implementation characteristics, the interplay of CoI elements, research methodologies, challenges, and best practices. Findings revealed a predominance of studies on undergraduate English learners, with mixed-methods approaches being most common. The integration of social, cognitive, and teaching presence significantly enhanced language acquisition and student engagement. Key challenges included technological integration, maintaining online engagement, effective instructional design, and addressing varying language proficiency levels. Best practices emphasized the strategic use of mobile applications, fostering online communities, enhancing teaching presence, and implementing personalized learning approaches. Gaps identified in the research included a predominant focus on English language studies, limited exploration at the graduate level, and a scarcity of longitudinal investigations examining long-term outcomes of CoI-informed blended learning. This review provided valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in blended language learning, offering a foundation for future research and implementation strategies. However, the study was limited by its focus on peer-reviewed articles from specific databases.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.11
References
Ahmad, A., Iqbal, B., & Rao, I. S. (2023). Efficacy of blended learning technique in enhancing ESL students’ linguistic skills. Global Language Review, VIII(II), 9-21. https://doi.org/10.31703/glr.2023(VIII-II).02
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
Albatti, H. (2023). Blended learning in English language teaching and learning: A focused study on a reading and vocabulary building course. World Journal of English Language, 13(5), 121. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n5p121
Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended learning in English teaching and learning: A review of the current literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(2), 232. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1002.03
Alger, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2022). “I took physical lessons for granted”: A case study exploring students’ interpersonal interactions in online synchronous lessons during the outbreak of COVID-19. System, 105, 102716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102716
Ali, M. F., Joyes, G., & Ellison, L. (2013). Using blended learning to enhance students’ cognitive presence. 2013 International Conference on Informatics and Creative Multimedia, 202-208. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICM.2013.42
Alvi, I. (2022). A comprehensive Community of Inquiry framework for exploring technology enhanced language learning. IAFOR Journal of Education, 10, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.10.2.04
Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
Ani, A. (2019). Positive feedback improves students’ psychological and physical learning outcomes. Indonesian Journal of Educational Studies, 22(2), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijes.v22i2.11776
Armellini, A., & DeStefani, M. (2016). Social presence in the 21st century: An adjustment to the Community of Inquiry framework. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1202-1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12302
Almusharraf, A., & Almusharraf, N. (2021). Socio-interactive practices and personality within an EFL online learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 3947-3966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10449-8
Asoodar, M., Atai, M. R., Vaezi, S., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). Examining effectiveness of communities of practice in online English for academic purposes (EAP) assessment in virtual classes. Computers & Education, 70, 291-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.016
Bailey, D. (2022). Interactivity during COVID-19: Mediation of learner interactions on social presence and expected learning outcome within videoconference EFL courses. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(2), 291-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00204-w
Bhattacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. Global Text Project. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3
Bower, M., Dalgarno, B., Kennedy, G. E., Lee, M. J. W., & Kenney, J. (2015). Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis. Computers & Education, 86, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.006
Bylund, E., Khafif, Z., & Berghoff, R. (2024). Linguistic and geographic diversity in research on second language acquisition and multilingualism: An analysis of selected journals. Applied Linguistics, 45(2), 308-329. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amad022
Candace, R. N.G. (2019). The Community of Inquiry framework as learning design model: A case study in postgraduate online education. Research in Learning Technology, 27(0). https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v27.2240
Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 Years of the Community of Inquiry framework.
TechTrends, 64(4), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2018). Language acquisition as skill learning. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 205-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.04.001
Chen, R. H. (2022). Effects of deliberate practice on blended learning sustainability: A Community of Inquiry perspective. Sustainability, 14(3), 1758. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031785
Cheng, G. (2022). Using the community of inquiry framework to support and analyse BYOD implementation in the blended EFL classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 54, 100854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100854
Chung, C. J., Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021). Roles and research trends of flipped classrooms in nursing education: A review of academic publications from 2010 to 2017. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(6), 883-904. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1619589
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Dona, E., Stover, S., & Broughton, N. (2014). Modern languages and distance education: thirteen days in the cloud. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.91273
Dooly, M., Thrasher, T., & Sadler, R. (2023). 'Whoa! Incredible!': Language learning experiences in virtual reality. RELC Journal, 54(2), 321-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231167610
Fiock, H. (2020). Designing a Community of Inquiry in online courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
Fornara, F., & Lara, L. A. (2019). Using visual social media in language learning to investigate the role of social presence. CALICO Journal, 36, 184-203. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.37205
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Garrison, Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. In Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118269558
Girik, A. M. D. (2020). Is the online learning good in the midst of COVID-19 Pandemic? The case of EFL learners. Jurnal Sinestesia, 10(1), 1-10. https://sinestesia.pustaka.my.id/journal/article/view/24
Gupta, Y., Khan, F. M., & Agarwal, S. (2021). Exploring factors influencing mobile learning in higher education – A systematic review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 15(12), 140. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i12.22503
Harb, J., & Krish, P. (2020). Cognitive presence in a blended learning environment at Jordanian universities. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.4
Heilporn, G., & Lakhal, S. (2020). Investigating the reliability and validity of the community of inquiry framework: An analysis of categories within each presence. Computers & Education, 145, 103712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103712
Hew, K. F., Huang, W., Du, J., & Jia, C. (2023). Using chatbots to support student goal setting and social presence in fully online activities: Learner engagement and perceptions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(1), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-022-09338-x
Hilliard, L. P., & Stewart, M. K. (2019). Time well spent: Creating a community of inquiry in blended first-year writing courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 41, 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.11.002
Honig, C. A., & Salmon, D. (2021). Learner presence matters: A learner-centered exploration into the Community of Inquiry framework. Online Learning, 25(2), 95-119. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i2.2237
Hosler, K. A. (2009). Examining the effects of teaching presence on student satisfaction in fully online learning environments. 2009 Annual Proceedings-Louisville. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Examining-the-Effects-of-Teaching-Presence-on-in-Hosler/6692521133a2ababf29217437349349994daddc0
Hsu, Y. C., Ho, H. N., Tsai, C. C., Hwang, G. J., Chu, H. C., Wang, C., & Chen, N. S. (2012). Research trends in technology-based learning from 2000 to 2009: A content analysis of publications in selected journals. Educational Technology and Society, 15, 354-370. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/75084/
Kahu, E. (2014). Increasing the emotional engagement of first-year mature-aged distance students: Interest and belonging. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(2), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v5i2.231
Kashinath, K., & Raju, R. (2023). An empirical research on the effectiveness online and offline classes of English language learning based on student’s perception in Telangana schools. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 15, 40-53. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2023.02.04
Kirsi, K., Lakkala, M., & Toom, A. (2021). Enrolled or engaged? Students’ perceptions of engagement and oral interaction in a blended learning language course. JALT CALL Journal, 17(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n1.268
Kitchenham, B. (2012). Systematic review in software engineering: Where we are and where we should be going. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evidential Assessment of Software Technologies, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1145/2372233.2372235
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report, 5, Version 2.3. EBSE.https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4125673/mod_resource/content/1/Guidelines%20for%20performing%20Systematic%20Literature%20Reviews%20in%20CS.PDF.
Kreijns, K., Van Acker, F., Vermeulen, M., & Van Buuren, H. (2014). Community of Inquiry: social presence revisited. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.5
Kurek, M., & Andreas, M.-H. (2019). The formative role of teaching presence in blended virtual exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 23(3), 52-73. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44696
Liaw, M.-L. (2019). EFL learners’ intercultural communication in an open social virtual environment. Educational Technology & Society, 22(2), 38-55. https://www.proquest.com/openview/99c49554e65d17c56628f2478fa405da/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1586335
Lin, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2019). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: A review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462
Ling, L. (2022). Teaching presence predicts cognitive presence in blended learning during COVID-19: The chain mediating role of social presence and sense of community. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 950687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950687
Ling, L., & Huang, C.-Q. (2024). The incorporation of peer learning into mosoteach-supported flipped language class: Effects on student motivation, participation, feedback and test performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 557-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12898
Liu, X., & Farhana, D. D. (2022). CoI-based teaching practices to promote EFL learners’ online discussion in China’s blended learning context. Asian Journal of University Education, 18(2), 477-488. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v18i2.18000
Lord, G., & Anderson, L. (2014). Twitter as a tool to promote community among language teachers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(2), 187-212. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/49768/.
Luz, E. H. D., & Darlene, G. M. (2017). Developing the oral skill in online English courses framed by the Community of Inquiry. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 19(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v19n1.55957
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2019). Investigating the process of learning with desktop virtual reality: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 134, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.002
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2016). Facebook and the others: Potentials and obstacles of social media for teaching in higher education. Computers & Education, 95, 216-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.012
Martin, F., Wang, C., & Sadaf, A. (2018). Student perception of helpfulness of facilitation strategies that enhance instructor presence, connectedness, engagement and learning in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 37, 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.01.003
Mathew, N. G., & Alidmat, A. O. H. (2013). A Study on the usefulness of audio-visual aids in efl classroom: implications for effective instruction. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/doi:10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p86
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e?learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
McKinley, J., & Rose, H. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367824471
Mehri, S., & Izadpanah, S. (2017). The effect of computer-mediated communication tools in online setting on Iranian EFL learners’ teaching, social and cognitive existence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(5), 978. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0805.20
Merhi, M., Hone, K., Tarhini, A., & Ameen, N. (2021). An empirical examination of the moderating role of age and gender in consumer mobile banking use: A cross-national, quantitative study. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34(4), 1144-1168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2020-0092
Mohd Salleh, K., Sulaiman, N. L., & Gloeckner, G. (2023). Exploring test concept and measurement through validity and reliability process in TVET research: guideline for the novice researcher. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2023.15.01.022
Mongeon, P., & Paul-Has, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5
Morales, R., Frenzel, M., & Bravo, P. R. (2022). Teaching presence vs. student perceived preparedness for testing in higher education online English courses during a global pandemic? challenges, tensions, and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 891566. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.891566
Morsi, W. K. (2023). The impact of the blended learning approach on sustainable EFL learning in an Egyptian context. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 7(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.30819/cmse.7-1.05
Nami, F., Marandi, S. S., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2018). Interaction in a discussion list: an exploration of cognitive, social, and teaching presence in teachers’ online Collaborations. ReCALL, 30(2), 375-398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000349
Nasrullah, N., Rosalina, E., Mariani, N., Rezma S. A., Alfisah, M., Rahmadina, N., & Ainah, N. (2024). Scrunitizing social presence of in-service EFL teachers’ instruction in the enactment of blended learning. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 5(1), 160-165. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v5i1.765
Nelson, R. L., & Damico, J. S. (2006). Qualitative research in literacy acquisition: A framework for investigating reading in children with language impairment. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20(7-8), 631-639. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200500266760
Nesrallah, S., Klepp, K. I., Budin, L. I., Luszczynska, A., Brinsden, H., Rutter, H., Bergstrøm, E., Singh, S., Debelian, M., Bouillon, C., & Katanasho, M. B. (2023). Youth engagement in research and policy: The CO-CREATE framework to optimize power balance and mitigate risks of conflicts of interest. Obesity Reviews, 24(S1), 13549. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13549
Nguyen, L. A. P. (2024). A systematic review on the effects of blended learning in EFL higher education contexts. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 1867-1876. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i1/20812
Oladipupo, O., Afolabi, I., Adubi, S., & Sowunmi, O. (2020). Discovering the research focus of higher academic institutions. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(6), 679-687. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1721635
Onysko, A. (2016). Modeling world Englishes from the perspective of language contact. World Englishes, 35(2), 196-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12191
Oztok, M., & Brett, C. (2011). Social presence and online learning: A review of research. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 25(3), 1-10. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/32440.
Parrish, C. W., Guffey, S. K., Williams, D. S., Estis, J. M., & Lewis, D. (2021). Fostering cognitive presence, social presence and teaching presence with integrated online—team-based learning. TechTrends, 65(4), 473-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00598-5
Pavel, N. (2021). Designing and learning by technological mediation: adoption, adaptation, attainment. FormAkademisk, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.3620
Pham, C. K., Chong, S. L., & Wan, R. (2022). Students’ experience of social presence in online learning. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, 299-303. https://doi.org/10.1145/3572549.3572597
Phuong, A. E., Nguyen, J., & Marie, D. (2017). Conceptualizing an adaptive and data-driven equity-oriented pedagogy. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 10(2), 1-20. https://journals.psu.edu/td/article/view/911
Plano, C., & Vicki, L. (2017). Mixed methods research. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 305-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262619
Ramalingam, S., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2022). Blended learning strategies for sustainable English as a second language education: A systematic review. Sustainability, 14(13), 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138051
Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923-945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. The Journal of Distance Education 14(2), 50-71. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58774853.pdf
Rubio, F., Thomas, J. M., & Li, Q. (2018). The role of teaching presence and student participation in Spanish blended courses. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(3), 226-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1372481
Rusmiyanto, Nining, H., Nining, Novita, K. T., Agus, R., & Mike, N. S. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence (ai) in developing English language learner’s communication skills. Journal on Education, 6(1), 750-757. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.2990
Selwyn, N. (2011). Social media in higher education. European Journal of Higher Education, 1(1), 1-10. http://sites.jmu.edu/flippEDout/files/2013/04/sample-essay-selwyn.pdf
Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Review of studies on technology-enhanced language learning and teaching. Sustainability, 12(2), 524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020524
Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster 'epistemic engagement' and 'cognitive presence' in online education. Computers & Education, 52(3), 543-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
Smidt, E., Chau, M. H., Rinehimer, E., & Leever, P. (2021). Exploring engagement of users of global Englishes in a community of inquiry. System, 98, 102477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102477
Solimani, E., Ameri, G. A., & Lotfi, A. (2019). Flipped vs. unplugged instructions: Sailing EFL learners’ oral proficiency through virtual and real learning communities. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 459-480. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12328a
Su, P., Rebecca, L., Verezub, E., Adibadiozaman, I. F., & Chen, W. S. (2020). Tracing EFL students’ flipped classroom journey in a writing class: Lessons from Malaysia. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(3), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1574597
Suzuki, Y., Nakata, T., & Dekeyser, R. (2019). Optimizing second language practice in the classroom: Perspectives from cognitive psychology. The Modern Language Journal, 103(3), 551-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12582
Turan, Z., & Akdag, C. B. (2020). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 590-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117
Wang, X., & Nurhasmiza, S. (2023). Design principles for integrating mobile applications to enhance teaching presence: Based on the survey of the problems in English learning in Chinese universities. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society. https://doi.org/10.55057/ijares.2023.5.3.39
Wilson, E., & Berge, Z. L. (2023). Educational experience and instructional design effectiveness within the Community of Inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i1.6751
Wu, W., Chen H. J., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners’ oral proficiency. Educational Technology & Society, 20, 142-157. https://www.proquest.com/openview/7b10039c9e4807baae5ec16b32d0b3a7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1586335
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yang, L., & Mohd, S. M. R. (2020). The relationship between critical thinking and the community of inquiry model: A quantitative study among EFL university students in China. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25, 965-973. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2020.1814359
Yongo, C. (2019). Instructional design considerations, challenges, and best practices on cross-cultural adult web-based learning experiences in higher education. In J. Keengwe & K. Kungu (Eds.), Handbook of research on cross-cultural online learning in higher education (pp. 335-363). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8286-1.ch017
Zainuddin, Z., Habiburrahim, H., Muluk, S., & Keumala, C. M. (2019). How do students become self-directed learners in the EFL flipped-class pedagogy? A study in higher education. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15270
Zhang, R. (2020). Exploring blended learning experiences through the Community of Inquiry framework. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 38-53. https://doi.org/10125/44707
Zhou, Q., Hashim, H., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2023). A systemic review (2014–2023) on the mobile-assisted blended learning for English as a foreign language education with a focus on empirical studies. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 17(24), Article 24. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i24.42019
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Xin Li, Nur Ainil Sulaiman, Azlina Abdul Aziz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).