Development of Quality Early Childhood Care and Education (QECCE) Scale: Factor Structural and Psychometric Properties

Authors

  • Wong Kung-Teck
  • Jamilah Omar
  • Sopia Md Yassin
  • Mazlina Che Mustafa
  • Norazilawati Abdullah
  • Bahbibi Rahmatullah
  • Suzani Mohamad Samuri

Keywords:

Quality of Early Childhood Care, Education, Quality Instrument, Structural Equation Model (SEM)

Abstract

This research is to design and develop an initial psychometric
evaluation of the Quality Early Childhood Care and Education (QECCE)
scale. The procedure of developing the QECCE item scale was
conducted by using the sequential missed method research approach.
The study involved 2464 samples. Systematic reviews were carried out
to identify the related constructs for the items, and discussion with
expert panels for its validity has been done, followed by an examination
of the psychometric quality of the items. The exploratory factor analysis
(EFA) generated a four factoring model with 22 items. Confirmatory
factor analysis (CFA) has proven all the items achieve the minimum
thresholds of model fit. Based on structural equation modeling (SEM)
outputs, the QECCE scale successfully explained 63.25% of the total
variance. On this basis, the QECCE scale is a valid and reliable survey
instrument specifically for assessing the quality of Malaysian ECCE.
The study confirmed that the predictors for examining the QECCE were
Centre Management (CM), Safety, Health, and Nutrition Management
(SHNM), Leadership and Professional Development (LPD), and Parent
and Community Involvement (PCI).

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.11.23

References

Cole, A., Vidgen, H., & Cleland, P. (2017). Food provision in early childhood education and care services: Exploring how staff determines nutritional adequacy. Nutrition & Dietetics, 74(1), 105–110. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12310

Colmer, K. (2017). Collaborative professional learning: Contributing to the growth of leadership, professional identity and professionalism. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(3), 436-449. doi:10.1080/1350293x.2017.1308167

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Fonsén, E., & Ukkonen-Mikkola, T. (2019). Early childhood education teachers’ professional development towards pedagogical leadership. Educational Research, 61(2), 181-196. doi:10.1080.00131881.2019.1600377

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited (7th ed.). Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.

Knauf, H. (2017). Making an impression: Portfolios as instruments of impression management for teachers in early childhood education and care centres. Early Childhood Education Journal, 45(4), 481–491. doi: 10.1007/s10643-016-0791-0

Jacobsen, K. H., Vale, S., Sambell, R., & Devine, A. (2018) Food allergy readiness and anaphylaxis management in early childhood education and care in Western Australia. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 43(4), 43–47. doi:10.23965/SJRC43.4.05

Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to Post-secondary Education). (2013). Ministry of Education.

Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 506-509. doi:10.1037/h0033601

Ministry of Education Blueprint, Malaysia. (2016). Ministry of Education.

Teo, T. (2010). Development and validation of the E-learning Acceptance Measure (ElAM). The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 148-152. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.02.001

Wong, K. T., Gwo-Jen, H., Goh, P. S. C., & Mohd Ariff, S. K. (2018). Effect of blended learning pedagogical practices on students' motivation and autonomy for the teaching of short stories in upper secondary English. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.

Wong, K. T, Hamzah, S. G., & Goh, P. S. C. (2016). Blended E-Learning acceptance as smart pedagogical tools: An initial study in Malaysia. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(4), 25-35.

Wong, K.-T, Teo, T., & Goh, P. S. C. (2014). Development of the Interactive Whiteboard Acceptance Scale (IWBAS): An initial study. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 268–277. doi:10.1037/t59864-000

Wong, K. T., Hamzah, M. S. G., Goh, P. S. C., & Abdullah, N. (2019). Blended Learning pedagogical practices for improving students' learning autonomy and academic results in learning . Religación. Revista De Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 4(17), 228–237.

Zeynep, A., & Çiğdem, H. (2016). Beginning early childhood education teachers’ classroom management concerns. Teachers and Teaching, 22(6), 700-715.

Zinsser, K. M., & Zinsser, A. (2016). Two case studies of preschool psychosocial safety climates. Research in Human Development, 13(1), 49-64. doi:10.1080/15427609.2016.1141278

Downloads

Published

2019-11-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)