Beyond Access: Reframing Engagement, Assessment, and Feedback in Open and Distance Learning at Universitas Terbuka Learning at Universitas Terbuka
Keywords:
distance learning; formative assessment; instructional design; learner engagementAbstract
Grounded in constructivist and learner-centred paradigms, contemporary scholarship on distance education highlights the integral role of instructional design, learner engagement, and assessment in improving academic outcomes. In Indonesia, where geographical challenges impede educational equity, Universitas Terbuka (UT) represents a critical case for examining scalable, technology-enabled learning models. This study proposes and evaluates an integrated e-learning framework tailored to UT’s open and distance education system using a convergent parallel mixed-methods design. Data were triangulated from surveys of 75 postgraduate students and semi-structured interviews with 12 participants to capture both statistical patterns and learning experiences. The results indicated that structured feedback, particularly when combining instructor-generated, automated, and peer responses, substantially enhances learner autonomy, motivation, and academic performance. Formative, low-stakes assessments were consistently preferred over high-stakes summative evaluations, as they reduced anxiety and supported ongoing learning. Clear rubrics and timely feedback emerged as critical to perceived fairness, motivation, and retention. The study also found that a hybrid approach to assessment, balancing synchronous and asynchronous formats, is essential: synchronous activities foster real-time engagement and critical thinking, while asynchronous tasks provide flexibility for working adults. Despite these strengths, challenges remained in ensuring feedback timeliness and consistency in assessment design. In response, the proposed framework integrates pedagogical best practices with adaptive assessment strategies to foster inclusive, high-quality distance learning. The study offers actionable insights for institutions seeking to enhance engagement, equity, and academic success in large-scale online education contexts.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.6.26
References
Adinda, A. H., Siahaan, H. E., Raihani, I. F., Aprida, N., Fitri, N., & Suryanda, A. (2021). Summative assessment and formative assessment of online learning. Report of Biological Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.37150/rebion.v2i1.1024
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 10(2), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004
Al-Maroof, R. S., Alhumaid, K., Akour, I., & Salloum, S. (2021). Factors that affect e-learning platforms after the spread of COVID-19: Post acceptance study. Data, 6(5), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6050049
Alisherovna, M. N. (2025). Foundations of developing learning-cognitive activities through the implementation of modern assessment methods in the teaching process. European International Journal of Pedagogics, 5(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-05-01-14
Bachtiar, B. (2025). Preparing citizens for the future of digital literacy and AI. In Digital citizenship and the future of AI engagement, ethics, and privacy (pp. 405–440). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9015-3.ch015
Bin Mubayrik, H. F. (2020). New trends in formative-summative evaluations for adult education. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941006
Boström, L., Collén, C., Damber, U., & Gidlund, U. (2021). A rapid transition from campus to emergent distant education; effects on students’ study strategies in higher education. Education Sciences, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110721
Chan, A. H., Kok, E. Y. Y., Razali, M. A. M., Lawrie, G. A., & Wang, J. T. H. (2022). Student perceptions and engagement in video-based learning for microbiology education. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 30(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.30.03.001
Cheah, S., & Li, S. (2020). The effect of structured feedback on performance: The role of attitude and perceived usefulness. Sustainability, 12(5), 2101–2115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052101
Colthorpe, K., Gray, H., Ainscough, L., & Ernst, H. (2021). Drivers for authenticity: student approaches and responses to an authentic assessment task. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(7). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1845298
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
Emihovich, B. (2024). Implementing universal design for learning in online courses to support multilingual students in higher education. The CATESOL Journal, 35(1), 534–547. https://doi.org/10.5070/B5.34833
Fanshawe, M., Delaney, N., & Powell, A. (2020). Utilizing instantaneous feedback to promote self-regulated learning in online higher education courses: The case for digital badges. In C. Dann & S. O’Neill (Eds.), Technology-enhanced formative assessment practices in higher education (pp. 41-59). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0426-0.ch003
Gezani, B. (2024). Challenges of online learning in the comprehensive open distance and elearning context – a case study of the University of South Africa. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 12(4), 1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20245716
Grono, S., O’Neill, K., Harrington, I., & Volpe, C. (2022). Building relationships through learning design as signature pedagogy: Re-connecting mature-aged online students with educators. ASCILITE Publications, 11(3), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2022.75
Hojeij, Z., & Ayber, P. O. (2022). Effectiveness of using digital feedback on EFL student writing skills. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.291111
Hollingshead, A. (2021). Designing engaging online environments. In Research anthology on developing effective online learning courses (pp. 516–530). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8047-9.ch027
Hu, J., Lee, P. G., & Harji, M. A. B. (2023). Designing authentic assessment tasks for EFL courses. SHS Web of Conferences, 168. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316801025
Ismailov, M., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Catering to inclusion and diversity with universal design for learning in asynchronous online education: A self-determination theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819884
Kim, Y., & Olesova, L. (2022). Expanding online professional learning in the post-COVID era: The potential of the universal design for learning framework. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 11(2), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.51869/112/yklo
Koenka, A. C., & Anderman, E. M. (2019). Personalized feedback as a strategy for improving motivation and performance among middle school students. Middle School Journal, 50(5), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2019.1674768
Kubai, E. (2023). A critical review of the challenges facing the competency-based assessments in the competency-based curriculum in Kenya. Journal of Education and Practices, 3(3), 83–97. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366866610_a_critical_review_of_the_challenges_facing_the_competency_based_assessments_in_the_competency-based_curriculum_in_nairobi_county_kenya
Kulu?akli, E. (2023). EFL learners’ language learning effort and autonomy in online distance education in higher education. Abant ?zzet Baysal Üniversitesi E?itim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2023..-1104227
Leontyeva, I. A. (2018). Modern distance learning technologies in higher education: Introduction problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/92284
Lin, L., & Barber, K. A. (2022). Tapping into the potential of student engagement with universal design for learning in pedagogical courses. Excelsior: Leadership in Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.14305/jn.19440413.2022.14.2.04
Liu, Y., & Zhang, H. (2022). Exploring the influencing factors and validity of formative assessment in online learning. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v9i4.4288
Marisa, Putri, D. A. P., Mujiono, & Jameel, A. H. (2024). Integration of artificial intelligence in e-learning: Distance education students’ responses. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 12(1), 186–197. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v12i1.62023
Maypa, A. L. Z., Marcial, D. E., & Montemayor, J. O. (2023). Student engagement, challenges and coping mechanisms in high school online distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 93(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v93i1.5148
Medeshova, ?., Kassymova, ?., Mutalova, Z., & Kamalova, G. (2022). Distance learning activation in higher education. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 11(3), 831–845. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2022.3.831
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mitchell, C., Cours Anderson, K., Laverie, D., & Hass, A. (2021). Distance be damned: The importance of social presence in a pandemic-constrained environment. Marketing Education Review, 31(4), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2021.1936561
Neroni, J., Meijs, C., Gijselaers, H. J. M., Kirschner, P. A., & de Groot, R. H. M. (2019). Learning strategies and academic performance in distance education. Learning and Individual Differences, 73(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.007
Oyetade, K., Harmse, A., & Zuva, T. (2023). Factors influencing students’ use of e-learning technologies. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 617–632. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.33
Prawisanthi, T. A., Dewi, N. L. P. E. S., Paramartha, A. A. G. Y., & Wahyuni, L. G. E. (2023). The implementation of English teachers’ authentic assessment in junior high schools. International Journal of Language and Literature, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.23887/ijll.v5i4.31865
Qassrawi, R. (2022). Education 3.0 underpinned with the heutagogical approach for a smooth shift to distance learning in higher education. International Journal of Education and Practice, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i1.3238
Riau, D., Darmanto, E., & Bachtiar, B. (2023). Enhancing distance learning: A framework for e-learning strategy and assessment at Universitas Terbuka Indonesia. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7, 3187–3198. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.6886
Schweighart, R., Hast, M., Pampel, A. M., Rebien, J. A., & Trautwein, C. (2024). Transition into distance education: A scoping review. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1130–1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101130
Semenova, L. A., Kazantseva, A. I., Suleimenova, G. A., Kairbekova, B. D., & Sadirbaeva, K. K. (2023). Improving the quality of distance education of future teachers. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 15(1), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v15i1.8675
Shakra, Z. A. (2023). Feedback as scaffolded instruction in the assessment of L2 writing tasks. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 19(29), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2023.v19n29p57
Surbakti, R., Umboh, S. E., Pong, M., & Dara, S. (2024). Cognitive load theory: Implications for instructional design in digital classrooms. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 2(6), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijen.v2i6.1659
Svihus, C. L. (2024). Online teaching in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3175–3193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11971-7
Todri, A., Papajorgji, P., Moskowitz, H., & Scalera, F. (2021). Perceptions regarding distance learning in higher education, smoothing the transition. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/9274
Topping, K. J. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of online and face-to-face peer learning in higher education: A review. Education Sciences, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040326
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-019-09792-3
Warren, S. J., & Churchill, C. (2022). Strategic, operations, and evaluation planning for higher education distance education. Distance Education, 43(2), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2022.2064821
Weru, N. (2023). The role of instructors support and feedback on the performance of online and distance learning. International Journal of Online and Distance Learning, 4(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.47604/ijodl.2001
Winarno, Komalasari, K., & Indrawadi, J. (2023). Authentic assessment in online learning to develop students’ character. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2023.44.4.13
Wong, J. Y., Azam, A. B., Cao, Q., Huang, L., Xie, Y., Winkler, I., & Cai, Y. (2024). Evaluations of virtual and augmented reality technology-enhanced learning for higher education. Electronics, 13(8), 1549–1563. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13081549
Yunus, M., & Bachtiar, B. (2025). Exploring the complexities of thesis writing in the distance mode: postgraduate students’ perspectives, challenges and strategies. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-07-2024-0099
https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.4095
Zhong, Q., Wang, Y., Lv, W., Xu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Self-regulation, teaching presence, and social presence: predictors of students’ learning engagement and persistence in blended synchronous learning. Sustainability, 14(9), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095619
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mohamad Yunus, Bachtiar Bachtiar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
