Development and Expert Consensus on a Context-Adapted Digital Competence Indicator System for Teachers in Chinese Private Universities

Authors

  • Yu Bi
  • Yuancheng Chang

Keywords:

digital competence; Chinese private universities; indicator system; mixed methods

Abstract

Rapid development in digital technologies has revolutionized higher education and raised teachers’ digital competence to high standards. Despite many efforts from international bodies such as DigCompEdu and TPACK to theorize on teacher digital competence, none of the proposed theoretical models sufficiently reflect the context of Chinese private universities. To fill the research gap and address practical issues, the current study adopted a mixed-methods research strategy using content analysis and expert interviews in constructing a digital competence indicator system for teachers in Chinese private universities. Four dimensions and twelve indicators of digital competence of Chinese private university teachers were developed based on data collected. The results have shown that contextual factors exert a major influence on teacher digital competence, including lack of technological support, practice-oriented requirements in teaching, as well as ethical issues in the emerging context of digitization in higher education. With its focus on digital competence basics and responsibility and ethics in digital environment, the developed framework can be considered a contextualized development of existing universal models of teacher digital competence. It enriches the literature with empirical studies in the field of teacher digital competence and will benefit practices of evaluating, develop teachers’ digital competence and carry out digital transformation projects in Chinese private universities as well as other universities facing similar conditions in developing countries.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.7.14

References

Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8

Bitegeko, R. M., Lawrent, G., & Cosmas, J. (2025). Assessment of student-teachers' digital competencies across educational aspects: the current status and areas for improvement. Educational Dimension, 12, 24-40. https://doi.org/10.55056/ed.785

Carpenter, J. P., Rosenberg, J. M., Kessler, A., Romero-Hall, E., & Fischer, C. (2024). The importance of context in teacher educators’ professional digital competence. Teachers and Teaching, 30(4), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2320155

Chiu, T. K. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197

Cid-Martínez, L., Aznar-Díaz, I., Gómez-García, G., & Martínez-Domingo, J. A. (2025). A systematic review on the level of digital competence of in-service Spanish teachers according to the DigCompEdu framework. Education Sciences, 15(6), Article 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060655

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104

Consoli, T. (2024). Different media education approaches predict distinct aspects of digital citizenship. Frontline Learning Research, 12(4), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v12i4.1555

Crompton, H. (2023). Evidence of the ISTE Standards for Educators leading to learning gains. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2244089

De la Calle, A. M., Pacheco-Costa, A., Gomez-Ruiz, M. A., & Guzman-Simon, F. (2021). Understanding teacher digital competence in the framework of social sustainability: A systematic review. Sustainability, 13(23), Article 13283. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313283

Doblinger, M. (2022). Individual competencies for self-managing team performance: A systematic literature review. Small Group Research, 53(1), 128–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964211041114

Dringó-Horváth, I., Rajki, Z., & Nagy, J. T. (2025). University teachers’ digital competence and AI literacy: Moderating role of gender, age, experience, and discipline. Education Sciences, 15(7), Article 868. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15070868

Duan, S., Yang, H., & Ning, F. (2023). Not-for-profit or for-profit? Research on the high-quality development path of private universities in China based on system dynamics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02445-9

Dutta, D., Mishra, S. K., & Budhwar, P. (2022). Ethics in competency models: A framework towards developing ethical behaviour in organisations. IIMB Management Review, 34(3), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2022.10.002

En?chescu, V. A. (2025). Building digital competence in higher education faculty: A systematic review and framework synthesis. International Journal of Education, Leadership, Artificial Intelligence, Computing, Business, Life Sciences, and Society, 2(02), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.65222/viral.2025.9.6

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

Feng, L., & Sumettikoon, P. (2024). An empirical analysis of EFL teachers’ digital literacy in Chinese higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), Article 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00474-1

Filo, Y., Rabin, E., & Mor, Y. (2024). An artificial intelligence competency framework for teachers and students: Co-created with teachers. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 26(S1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2024-0012

Ghomi, M., & Redecker, C. (2019). Digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu): Development and evaluation of a self-assessment instrument for teachers' digital competence. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2019) (Vol. 1, pp. 541–548). SCITEPRESS. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007679005410548

Gu, N., Donovan, L., Green, T., Ma, S., & Currie, D. J. (2023). Higher education faculty concerns teaching in a hybrid environment: Implications for Chinese private higher education faculty developers and faculty. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 5(1), Article ep2302. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/12638

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533

Horváth, L., Pintér, M., Misley, H., & Dringó-Horváth, I. (2025). Validity evidence regarding the use of DigCompEdu as a self-reflection tool: The case of Hungarian teacher educators. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12914-6

Howard, S. K., & Tondeur, J. (2023). Higher education teachers' digital competencies for a blended future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10211-6

Ifenthaler, D., Majumdar, R., Gorissen, P., Judge, M., Mishra, S., Raffaghelli, J., & Shimada, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Implications for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(4), 1693–1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09747-0

Inamorato dos Santos, A., Chinkes, E., Carvalho, M. A., Solórzano, C. M., & Marroni, L. S. (2023). The digital competence of academics in higher education: Is the glass half empty or half full? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00376-0

Kang, L., & Xu, X. (2025). Progress and prospect of digital transformation of higher education in China: Bibliometric and visualized analysis. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 31(1), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714241300086

Katsamakas, E., Pavlov, O. V., & Saklad, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions: A systems approach. Sustainability, 16(14), Article 6118. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146118

Kiryakova, G., & Kozhuharova, D. (2024). The digital competences necessary for the successful pedagogical practice of teachers in the digital age. Education Sciences, 14(5), Article 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050507

König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650

Lai, J. W., & Bower, M. (2020). Evaluation of technology use in education: Findings from a critical analysis of systematic literature reviews. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(3), 241–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12412

Lan, H., Bailey, R., & Tan, W. H. (2024). Assessing the digital competence of in-service university educators in China: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 10(16), e35675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35675

Lee, Y. H., Kim, K. S., & Lee, K. H. (2020). The effect of tuition fee constraints on financial management: Evidence from Korean private universities. Sustainability, 12(12), Article 5066. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125066

Lei, H., & Jiang, Z. (2025). Assessing the digital competence and its influencing factors among foreign language teachers in Chinese universities. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05394-7

Liu, J. (2025). Managing massification: Challenges of expansion and equity in Chinese higher education. The Development of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(5), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.71204/axkw0879

Liu, X. (2020). Institutional governance in the development of private universities in China. Higher Education, 79(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00409-0

Lucas, M., Bem-Haja, P., Siddiq, F., Moreira, A., & Redecker, C. (2021). The relation between in-service teachers' digital competence and personal and contextual factors: What matters most? Computers & Education, 160, Article 104052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104052

Miao, X., Dawod, A. Y., & Phaphuangwittayakul, A. (2023). The implications, challenges, and pathways of digital transformation of university education in China. In Proceedings of the 7th TICC International Conference (pp. 293–312). Chiang Mai University.

Momdjian, L., Manegre, M., & Gutiérrez-Colón, M. (2024). Assessing and bridging the digital competence gap: A comparative study of lebanese student teachers and in-service teachers using the DigCompEdu framework. Discover Education, 3(1), Article 198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00308-2

Moorhouse, B. L., Kohnke, L., & Chiu, T. K. (2024). Developing a context-and subject-specific professional digital competence framework for beginning English language teachers in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(5), 1105–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00778-2

Nagel, I., & Amdam, S. H. (2025). Teachers’ professional digital competence. Encyclopedia, 5(3), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5030148

Nasa, P., Jain, R., & Juneja, D. (2021). Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World Journal of Methodology, 11(4), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(1), Article 137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003

Peng, R., Razak, R. A., & Halili, S. H. (2023). Investigating the factors affecting ICT integration of in-service teachers in Henan Province, China: Structural equation modeling. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), Article 380. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01871-z

Peters, M., Ejjaberi, A. E., Martínez, M. J., & Fàbregues, S. (2022). Teacher digital competence development in higher education: Overview of systematic reviews. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7543

Pettersson, F. (2021). Understanding digitalization and educational change in school by means of activity theory and the levels of learning concept. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10239-8

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu (JRC Science for Policy Report No. JRC107466). Publications Office of the European Union. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC107466

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Schmid, M., Brianza, E., Mok, S. Y., & Petko, D. (2024). Running in circles: A systematic review of reviews on technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 214, Article 105024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105024

Schreier, M. (2023). Qualitative Erhebungsmethoden [Qualitative data collection methods]. In Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor (pp. 247–279). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34362-9_5Scott, T., & Guan, W. (2023). Challenges facing Thai higher education institutions financial stability and perceived institutional education quality. Power and Education, 15(3), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438221140014

Selwyn, N. (2021). Ed-Tech within limits: Anticipating educational technology in times of environmental crisis. E-learning and Digital Media, 18(5), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211022951

Shang, Z. (2023). Use of Delphi in health sciences research: a narrative review. Medicine, 102(7), e32829. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000032829

Skantz-Åberg, E., Lantz-Andersson, A., Lundin, M., & Williams, P. (2022). Teachers’ professional digital competence: An overview of conceptualisations in literature. Cogent Education, 9(1), Article 2063224. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2063224

Škrinjari?, B. (2022). Competence-based approaches in organizational and individual context. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01047-1

Smestad, B., Hatlevik, O. E., Johannesen, M., & Øgrim, L. (2023). Examining dimensions of teachers’ digital competence: A systematic review pre-and during COVID-19. Heliyon, 9(6), Article e16677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16677

Starkey, L. (2020). A review of research exploring teacher preparation for the digital age. Cambridge Journal of Education, 50(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2019.1625867

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Tondeur, J., Howard, S., Van Zanten, M., Gorissen, P., Van der Neut, I., Uerz, D., & Kral, M. (2023). The HeDiCom framework: Higher education teachers’ digital competencies for the future. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10193-5

Von Der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies: review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(8), 1525–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013

Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641

Xu, B. (2021). From massification towards post-massification: Policy and governance of higher education in China. International Journal of Chinese Education, 10(3), Article 22125868211046032. https://doi.org/10.1177/22125868211046032

Zeng, M., Abdullah, Z., & Cheah, K. S. (2025). Pre-service Teachers' Digital Competence: A Systematic Review of Factors, Frameworks, and Global Patterns. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(8), 218–247. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.8.10

Zhang, J., & Wei, Y. (2024). Exploring the dynamics of private higher education in China: A human capital and institutional analysis [Preprint]. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202407.1887.v1

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Bi, Y., & Chang, Y. . (2026). Development and Expert Consensus on a Context-Adapted Digital Competence Indicator System for Teachers in Chinese Private Universities. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(7), 302–325. Retrieved from https://ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2953

Issue

Section

Articles