Technology Acceptance Model in Digital Higher Education (2015-2025): A Bibliometric Analysis of Theoretical Evolution and Collaboration Patterns
Keywords:
Technology acceptance model (TAM); digital higher education; bibliometric analysis; research collaboration; thematic evolutionAbstract
The technology acceptance model (TAM) has been central to understanding technology adoption in higher education (HE) for decades. However, a comprehensive decade?scale synthesis of its evolution in digital learning contexts has remained absent. This bibliometric review systematically mapped TAM research in digital HE from 2015 to 2025. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A total of 429 Scopus?indexed articles were analyzed using VOSviewer for co?authorship, keyword co?occurrence, and co?citation analyses. The literature review confirmed that prior studies were largely qualitative, domain?specific, or limited in time span. Three salient findings emerged. First, publication output grew steadily, with a sharp acceleration during the COVID?19 pandemic. Second, the field shifted from core TAM constructs (perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use) toward affective, social, and contextual variables such as enjoyment, self?efficacy, and social influence. Third, research was geographically concentrated. Malaysia (62), Saudi Arabia (41), and China (38) led output. Collaboration networks showed strong regional clustering but weak intercontinental ties. Structural holes thus limited cross?cultural validation. Keyword analysis further revealed an emerging emphasis on artificial intelligence (AI), ChatGPT, and immersive technologies. It was concluded that TAM remained highly adaptable but faced challenges in geographic dispersion and theoretical generalization. Future research should prioritize international collaboration, culturally adaptable extensions, and deeper investigation of AI?driven learning systems. Educational institutions are recommended to use the identified collaboration patterns to form international consortia and faculty exchanges. This review provides a structured baseline for cross?cultural and collaborative research on technology acceptance in HE.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.7.3
References
Abdullah, F., & Ward, R. (2016). Developing a general extended technology acceptance model for E-learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 238–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036
Abuhassna, H., Yahaya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Zaid, N. M., Samah, N. A., Awae, F., Nee, C. K., & Alsharif, A. H. (2023). Trends on using the technology acceptance model (TAM) for online learning: A bibliometric and content analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1788
Ajibade, S. S. M., Adhikari, N., & Ngo-Hoang, D. L. (2022). An analysis of social networking for e-learning in institutions of higher learning using perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Scientometric Research, 11(2), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.11.2.26
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Al-Adwan, A. S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G. A., Albelbisi, N. A., & Habibi, A. (2023). Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to predict university students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 15381–15413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3
Alalwan, A. A., Baabdullah, A. M., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia: Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust. Technology in Society, 55, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.007
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
Alqahtani, M. A., Alamri, M. M., Sayaf, A. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2022). Exploring student satisfaction and acceptance of e-learning technologies in Saudi higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.939336
Alsharida, R. A., Hammood, M. M., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review of the technology acceptance model from 2017 to 2020. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(5), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i05.18093
Alyoussef, I. Y. (2023). Acceptance of e-learning in higher education: The role of task-technology fit with the information systems success model. Heliyon, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13751
Bergman, M. E., & Feser, J. E. (2020). Industrial and regional clusters: Concepts and comparative applications. In S. Loveridge & R. Jackson (Eds.), Web book of regional science (Vol. 2). WVU Research Repository. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/rri-web-book/5/
Bhattacharya, S., Panyam, S., Deshmukh, G., Gatala, S., Vemoori, V., & Seth, D. (2024). Integrating user experience and acceptance in authentication: A synthesis of technology acceptance model and user-centered design principles. Computer Trends and Technology, 72, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V72I4P102
Bhattarai, S., & Maharjan, S. (2020). Determining the factors affecting on digital learning adoption among the students in Kathmandu Valley: An application of technology acceptance model (TAM). International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 10(03), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.10.3.20
Bizzi, L. (2013). The dark side of structural holes: A multilevel investigation. Management, 39(6), 1554–1578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471385
Cheung, S. K., Wang, F. L., & Kwok, L. F. (2023). Online learning and blended learning: New practices derived from the pandemic-driven disruption. Computing in Higher Education, 35(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09350-9
Chiu, M. L. (2025). Exploring user awareness and perceived usefulness of generative AI in higher education: The moderating role of trust. Education and Information Technologies, 30(15), 21317–21351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13612-7
Dahri, N. A., Yahaya, N., Al-Rahmi, W. M., Aldraiweesh, A., Alturki, U., Almutairy, S., & Soomro, R. B. (2024). Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study. Heliyon, 10(8), e29317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29317
Dalle, J., Aydin, H., & Wang, C. X. (2024). Cultural dimensions of technology acceptance and adaptation in learning environments. Formative Design in Learning, 8, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-024-00095-x
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. https://doi.org/10.36863/mds.a.14027
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. , & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Enyoojo, S. F., Ijah, C. E., Etukudo, E. M., Usman, I. M., Ezeonuogu, C. S., Adaramati, T., Kabanyoro, A., Diaz, M. E. F., Rosales, Y. D., & Aigbogun, E. (2024). Satisfaction and learning experience of students using online learning platforms for medical education. BMC Medical Education, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06411-0
Ferdousi, B. (2022). Challenges of technology accessibility, computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety and cyberphobia in adoption of e-learning systems among students. Advances in Online Education A Peer-Reviewed Journal, 1(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.69554/JWPC8265
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, PA: Addison Wesley. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
Geddam, S. M., Nethravathi, N., & Hussian, A. A. (2024). Understanding AI adoption: The mediating role of attitude in user acceptance. Informatics Education and Research, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.52783/jier.v4i2.975
Grani?, A., & Maranguni?, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
Haidegger, T. P., Galambos, P., Tar, J. K., Kozlovszky, M., Zrubka, Z., Eigner, G., & Rudas, I. J. (2024). Strategies and outcomes of building a successful university research and innovation ecosystem. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 21(10), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.12700/APH.21.10.2024.10.2
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s recent consequences: Using dimension scores in theory and research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/147059580111002
Huang, J. (2020). Successes and challenges: Online teaching and learning of chemistry in higher education in China in the time of COVID-19. Chemical Education, 97(9), 2810–2814. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00671
Mulenga, R., & Shilongo, H. (2025). Hybrid and blended learning models: Innovations, challenges, and future directions in education. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v4i1.495
Mutambara, D., & Bayaga, A. (2021). Determinants of mobile learning acceptance for STEM education in rural areas. Computers & Education, 160, 104010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104010
Orduña-Malea, E., & Costas, R. (2021). Link-based approach to study scientific software usage: The case of VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 126(9), 8153–8186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04082-y
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(n71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pellegrini, M., & Vivanet, G. (2021). Evidence-based policies in education: Initiatives and challenges in Europe. ECNU Review of Education, 4(1), 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120924670
Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., Metri, B., & Kaushik, N. (2024). Students’ adoption of AI-based teacher-bots (T-bots) for learning in higher education. Information Technology & People, 37(1), 328–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2021-0152
Pranckut?, R. (2021). Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The titans of bibliographic information in today’s academic world. Publications, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010012
Rehman, A. U., Raza, M. A., & Abbas, N. (2025). Understanding AI adoption in education: The role of readiness, confidence, and social influence among Pakistani students. Innovation Journal of Social Sciences and Economic Review, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.36923/ijsser.v7i1.300
Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Md. Ali, A., Abu Bakar, S., & Mohd Tahir, L. (2022). A systematic review of the technology acceptance model for the sustainability of higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic and identified research gaps. Sustainability, 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811389
Saidi, S., Basir, A., Juhaidi, A., & Salabi, A. (2022). Mediating role of attitude and impact of social support, technical support, and perceived ease of use in adoption of technology during COVID-19. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), 100. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2022.100.001
Sayaf, A. M., Alamri, M. M., Alqahtani, M. A., & Alrahmi, W. M. (2022). Factors influencing university students’ adoption of digital learning technology in teaching and learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010493
Shen, Q. (2025). From policy exploration to strategic drive: The development and trends of foreign language policy research in China—A CiteSpace-based bibliometric analysis. Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 9(9), 1813–1817. https://doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2025.09.019
Shonfeld, M., Cotnam-Kappel, M., Judge, M., Ng, C. Y., Ntebutse, J. G., Williamson-Leadley, S., & Yildiz, M. N. (2021). Learning in digital environments: A model for cross-cultural alignment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 2151–2170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09967-6
To, A. T., & Trinh, T. H. M. (2021). Understanding behavioral intention to use mobile wallets in Vietnam: Extending the TAM model with trust and enjoyment. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 189661. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1891661
Turnbull, D., Chugh, R., & Luck, J. (2021). Transitioning to E-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: How have higher education institutions responded to the challenge? Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 6401–6419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10633-w
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Venkatesh, V., Thong, James. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
Yunior, M., & Augustine, Y. (2024). The influence of social influence, relative advantage, user satisfaction on cloud-based e-learning with behavioral intention as a mediating variable. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 56, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v56i1.10742
Zhao, H., & Dong, J. (2025). Validating the adoption of AI-assisted blended learning through the TAM analysis of students’ perceptions and behavioral intentions. Proceedings of the 2025 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Multimedia Technology (EIMT 2025) Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities, 358–364. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-750-2_35
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lulu Li, Lei Mee Thien, Annamali Devisakti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
