Exploring the Role of Metacognitive Strategies in Research Writing: A Learner-Centered Perspective
Keywords:
metacognitive strategies; self-regulated learning; research writing; learner-centered approach; qualitative phenomenology (SRL)Abstract
This study explores the metacognitive strategies of education students in educational research writing using a learner-centered perspective grounded in Flavell’s metacognitive theory (1979) and Zimmerman’s self-regulated learning (SRL) model (2000). Employing a qualitative phenomenological design, data were gathered through semi-structured interviews with ten purposely selected fourth-year education students with direct experience in research writing. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to interpret the data. Findings reveal four (4) key themes: education students’ perceptions and application of metacognitive strategies in research writing, metacognitive challenges encountered by education students in the planning, execution, and writing stages, learner-centered instructional approaches fostering or hindering the enactment of metacognitive regulation essential to research competence, and education students' reflections and learning Adaptation. Results indicate that while students demonstrate strong conceptual understanding of metacognition, their regulatory practices remain largely reactive rather than proactive, particularly in complex tasks such as synthesis and data analysis. Emotional challenges, peer collaboration, and instructor feedback were also found to significantly shape students’ metacognitive engagement. The study concludes that research writing serves as a developmental space for strengthening self-regulated learning, although students require stronger instructional scaffolding to enhance strategic and emotional regulation. The study recommends structured reflection, explicit strategy instruction, and targeted feedback should be integrated to support the transfer of metacognitive skills.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.7.1
References
Akamatsu, D., Nakaya, M., & Koizumi, R. (2019). Effects of Metacognitive Strategies on the Self-Regulated Learning Process: The Mediating Effects of Self-Efficacy. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 9(12), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9120128
Alfaifi, M. J. (2021). A suggested model for metacognitive strategy instruction in EFL writing classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(4), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1954569
Alfonso, G.S. (2025). Challenges in writing a research paper: Study of undergraduate students’ experiences. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 11(13s), 1737–1744. https://doi.org/10.64252/fg314p32
Anthonysamy, L. (2021). The use of metacognitive strategies for undisrupted online learning: Preparing university students in the age of pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 6881–6899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10518-y
An, D., Ye, C., & Liu, S. (2024). The influence of metacognition on learning engagement: the mediating effect of learning strategy and learning behavior. Current Psychology. 43, 31241–31253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06400-y
Azevedo, R. (2020). Reflections on the field of metacognition: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. Metacognition and Learning, 15(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09231-x
Barenberg, J., & Dutke, S. (2019). Testing and metacognition: Retrieval practice effects on metacognitive monitoring in learning from text. Memory, 27(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1506481
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Chardonnens, S. (2025). Adapting educational practices for Generation Z: Integrating metacognitive strategies and artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1504726.https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1504726
Chen, S., Sermeno, R., Hodge, K. N., Murphy, S., Agenbroad, A., Schweitzer, A., Tsao, L. L., & Roe, A. J. (2024). Young children’s self-regulated learning benefited from a metacognition-driven science education intervention for early childhood teachers. Education Sciences, 14(6), 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060565
Cromley, J. G., & Kunze, A. J. (2020). Metacognition in education: Translational research. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 6(1), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000218
Dennis, J.L., & Somerville, M.P. (2023). Supporting thinking about thinking: examining the metacognition theory-practice gap in higher education. Higher Education, 86, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00904-x
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
Firmansyah, F. F., Sa’dijah, C., Subanji, S., & Qohar, A. (2022). Characterizations of students’ metacognition in solving geometry problems through positioning group work. TEM Journal, 11(3), 1391–1398. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM113-50
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Gupta, N., Ali, K., Jiang, D., Fink, T., & Du, X. (2024). Beyond autonomy: Unpacking self-regulated and self-directed learning through the lens of learner agency—A scoping review. BMC Medical Education, 24, Article 1519. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06476-x
Kadum, B. M. C., & Karpudewan, M. (2025). Influence of self-efficacy and metacognition on Malaysian pre-university students’ chemistry academic motivation: The moderating role of gender and locality. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 26, 682–700. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4RP00334A
Karlen, Y. (2016). Differences in students’ metacognitive strategy knowledge, motivation, and strategy use: A typology of self-regulated learners. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.942895
Kesuma, A. T., Harun, H., Zamroni, Z., Putranta, H., & Kistoro, H. C. (2020). Evaluation of the self-regulated learning model in high schools: A systematic literature review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4792–4806. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081051
Khalid, F. (2026). Investigating the impact of metacognitive regulation on students' academic performance: A quantitative study of Chinese distance learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1726956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1726956
Li, H. (2025). Reflective practice for pre-service teachers’ professional development. SAGE Open, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251363136
Li, Z., Wu, J., Thurston, A., & O’Keeffe, J. (2026). A systematic review of second language (L2) student writers' metacognitive experiences. British Educational Research Journal, 00, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.70109
Musullulu, H., Garcia-Orza, J., Gómez Vázquez, A., & Garcia-Sanz, A. (2025). Cognitive control and metacognitive awareness: Do they shape academic achievement in university students? Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1633996. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1633996
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Ontog, J. (2024). Metacognitive Awareness and Research Skills Among Senior High School Students. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(10), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0430
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Parmigiani, D., Nicchia, E., Murgia, E., & Ingersoll, M. (2024). Formative assessment in higher education: An exploratory study within programs for professionals in education. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1366215. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1366215
Patty, J. (2024). Addressing student writing challenges: A review of difficulties and effective strategies. Education Journal: Journal of Educational Research and Development, 8(2), 369–392. https://doi.org/10.31537/ej.v8i2.1938
Pérez-Jorge, D., Boutaba-Alehyan, M., González-Contreras, A. I., & Pérez-Pérez, I. (2025). Examining the effects of academic stress on student well-being in higher education. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 449. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04698-y
Prihandoko, L. A., Morganna, R., & Amalia, S. N. (2024). Self-efficacy and metacognition as the mediated effects of growth mindset on academic writing performance. Journal of Language and Education, 10(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2024.13979
Qin, C., Zhang, R., & Xiao, Y. (2022). A questionnaire-based validation of metacognitive strategies in writing and their predictive effects on the writing performance of English as a foreign language student writer. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1071907. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1071907
Republic Act No. 10173. (2012). Data Privacy Act of 2012. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/
Rhodes, M. G. (2019). Metacognition. Teaching of Psychology, 46(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319834381
Rivas, S. F., Saiz, C., & Ossa, C. (2022). Metacognitive Strategies and Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 913219. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913219
Riwayatiningsih, R., Yuliasri, I., Rukmini, D., & Pratama, H. (2024). The differential impact of specific metacognitive strategies on EFL academic writing performance. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i1.7986
Rosdiana, L. A., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2023). The role of metacognitive strategies in academic writing skills in higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.18
Sabaliauskas, S., Gražulis, D., Žilinskien?, N., & Kauk?nas, T. (2025). Metacognitive strategies improve self-regulation skills in expert sports coaches. Scientific Reports, 15, 3434 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-86606-7
Sasson, I., & Tifferet, S. (2025). Enhancing Undergraduate Metacognitive Awareness and Self-Efficacy: Effective Instructional Practices for Research Question Formulation. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12888. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12888
Shen, X., Ismail, L., Jeyaraj, J. J., & Teng, M. F. (2024). Metacognitive strategies, writing self-efficacy and writing anxiety in different learning modes: A two-wave longitudinal model. System, 126, Article 103485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103485
Smith, A. K., Black, S., & Hooper, L. M. (2020). Metacognitive Knowledge, Skills, and Awareness: A Possible Solution to Enhancing Academic Achievement in African American Adolescents. Urban Education, 55(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917714511
Somatori, K., & Kunisato, Y. (2022). Metacognitive Ability and Precision of Confidence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 706538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.706538
Stanton, J.D., Sebesta, A. J., & Dunlosky, J. (2021). Fostering Metacognition to Support Student Learning and Performance. CBE - Life Sciences Education, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0289
Sun, Q., & Zhang, L. J. (2022a). Examining the effects of English as a foreign language student-writers’ metacognitive experiences on their writing performance. Current Psychology, 42, 23743–23758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03416-0
Sun, Q., & Zhang, L. J. (2022b). Understanding learners’ metacognitive experiences in learning to write in English as a foreign language: A structural equation modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 986301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986301
Sun, Q., Zhang, L. J., & Carter, S. (2021). Investigating students’ metacognitive experiences: Insights from the English as a foreign language learners’ writing metacognitive experiences questionnaire (EFLLWMEQ). Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 744842. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744842
Sun, T., Zhang, L. J., & Wang, C. (2024). English as a foreign language learners’ metacognitive experience and writing development: Unraveling the process of learning EFL writing. System, 121, 103188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103188
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2016). A questionnaire-based validation of multidimensional models of self-regulated learning strategies. The Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12339
Teng, L. S., & Zhang, L. J. (2020). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing, 48, 100701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100701
Teng, M, F. (2019). The role of metacognitive knowledge and regulation in mediating university EFL learners’ writing performance. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(5), 436–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2019.1615493
Teng, M. F. (2022). Effects of cooperative–metacognitive instruction on EFL learners' writing and metacognitive awareness. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.18356
Teng, M. F., & Ma, M. (2024). Assessing metacognition-based student feedback literacy for academic writing. Assessing Writing, 59, 100811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100811
Teng, M. F., Qin, C., & Wang, C. (2022). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and Learning, 17(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4
Teng, M. F., Wang, C., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Assessing self-regulatory writing strategies and their predictive effects on young EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 51, 100573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100573
Wang, K., Zhang, L. J., & Cooper, M. (2025). Metacognitive instruction for improving the effectiveness of collaborative writing for EFL learners’ writing development. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34, 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-024-00886-7
Wei, Y., & Liu, D. (2024). Incorporating peer feedback in academic writing: A systematic review of benefits and challenges. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1506725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1506725
Wolters, C. A., & Brady, A. C. (2021). College students' time management: A self-regulated learning perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1319–1351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09519-z
Xie, H. (2026) Self-efficacy and metacognitive strategies in blended science learning: a self-regulated learning perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1780894. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1780894
Xue, Y., & Khalid, F. (2026). Investigating the impact of metacognitive regulation on students' academic performance: A quantitative study of Chinese distance learners. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1726956. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1726956
Zhang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2019). Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) in second/foreign language teaching. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 883–898). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58542-0_47-1
Zhang, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). The effect of feedback on metacognitive strategy uses in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(5-6),1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2069822
Zhang, W. W., Zhang, L. J., & Wilson, A. J. (2021). Supporting learner success: Revisiting strategic competence through developing an inventory for computer-assisted speaking assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 689581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689581
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jane M. Malit, Jenelyn Tagulao Peña, Hazel M. Bautista
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).
