Implications of Separate Marks for Physics and Chemistry in Grade 12 Results

Authors

  • Vhutshilo Nekhubvi
  • Rene Pearce
  • Malebogo Legodi
  • Wandile Nhlapho

Keywords:

Physics; Chemistry; Higher Education; Extended Curriculum Program

Abstract

The South African Grade 12 with a bachelor’s endorsement is the most common route for admission into university degree programmes. However, many learners do not meet the required Physical sciences and Mathematics marks for admission into mainstream degrees and instead enter Extended Curriculum Programmes (ECPs) that aim to develop their academic capacity. This study assesses whether reporting separate Grade 12 Physics and Chemistry grades, rather than a Physical sciences grade, would better reflect the students' abilities and strengthen admissions and placement decisions in South African higher education. Using a longitudinal analysis of historical performance data from first-year ECP students over a 10-year period, together with stakeholder perspectives, the study examines the likely consequences of separating the subjects on the Grade 12 certificate. The main findings are that (1) learners who know their strengths are better informed when making subject and career choices, and (2) teaching and learning can improve when curriculum changes respond to clearer performance indicators. Based on these findings, the study recommends a pilot project to test the feasibility of awarding separate grades for Physics and Chemistry in South African schools, alongside careful implementation and the ongoing assessment of fairness and practical constraints. If workable, separate reporting could support more accurate admissions decisions and the better placement of students into appropriate programmes, including ECP pathways.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.25.2.35

References

Badmus, O. T., & Jita, L. C. (2022). Didactic handout on Nature of Science: Toward effective teaching of Physical sciences curriculum. Science Education International, 33(3), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i3.6

Banda, H. J., & Nzabahimana, J. (2023). The impact of physics education technology (PhET) interactive simulation-based learning on motivation and academic achievement among Malawian physics students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10010-3

Daker, R. J., Gattas, S. U., Sokolowski, H. M., Green, A. E., & Lyons, I. M. (2021). First-year students' math anxiety predicts STEM avoidance and underperformance throughout university, independently of math ability. npj Science of Learning, 6(1), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00095-7

Davidowitz, B., & Schreiber, B. (2008). Facilitating adjustment to higher education: Towards enhancing academic functioning in an academic development programme. Journal of Higher Education, 22(1), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v22i1.25781

De Wee, M. F. (2024). Exploring the design and implementation of an entrance readiness assessment and its relationship with performance outcomes among first-year TVET college students [Doctoral dissertation, University of the Western Cape].

Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS): Physical Sciences Grades 10–12.

Douglas, K. (2021). An ethnographic case study exploring how “most-able, least-likely” young people form their higher education aspiration (PhD thesis, University of Warwick). Warwick Research Archive Portal.

Sancassani, P. (2023). The effect of subject-specific teacher qualifications on student science achievement (EconPol Policy Brief No. 51). EconPol Europe. at the University of Munich. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102309

Grayson, D. (1996). A holistic approach to preparing disadvantaged students to succeed in tertiary science studies. Part 1. Design of the Science Foundation Programme. International Journal of Science, 18, 993–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180810

Grussendorff, S., Liebenberg, M., & Houston, J. (2004). Selection for the Science Foundation Programme (University of Natal): The development of a selection instrument. South African Journal of Higher Education, 18, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v18i1.25442

Gudyanga, R. (2017). Physical sciencess teachers' perspectives and practices on the new Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (Doctoral thesis). University of the Free State.

Gudyanga, R., & Jita, L. C. (2018). Mapping physical sciencess teachers' concerns regarding the new curriculum in South Africa. Issues in Educational Research, 28(2), 308–326.

Herman, H. D. (1995). School-leaving examinations, selection and equity in higher education in South Africa. Comparative Education, 31(2), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050069529146

Holubova, R. (2024). Does generation Z (and Alpha) need physics as a separate school subject? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2715(1), Article 012003, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2715/1/012003

Jaremus, F., Sincock, K., Patfield, S., Prieto, E., Fray, L., & Gore, J. (2022). Aspirations, equity, and higher education course choice: The path travelled (Research report). National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education. https://www.acses.edu.au/

Koch, E., Foxcroft, C., & Watson, A. (2001). A developmental focus to student access at the University of Port Elizabeth: Process and preliminary insights in placement assessment. Journal of Higher Education, 15, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajhe.v15i2.25363

Kolobe, L., & Hobden, P. (2022). Influence of examinations on classroom practice: Experienced teachers' pedagogical choices in teaching chemical equilibrium. South African Journal of Education, 42(Suppl. 1), Article a1982. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v42ns1a1982

Kumar, P., Sahani, J., Rawat, N., Debele, S., Tiwari, A., Emygdio, A. P. M., Abhijith, K. V., Holmes, K., & Pfautsch, S. (2023). Using empirical science education in schools to improve climate change literacy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178, 113232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113232

Mabila, T., Malatje, S., Addo-Bediako, A., Kazeni, M., & Mathabatha, S. (2006). The role of foundation programmes in science education: The UNIFY programme at the University of Limpopo, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 26, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.08.004

Maestrales, S., Zhai, X., Touitou, I., Baker, Q., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2021). Using machine learning to score multi-dimensional assessments of chemistry and physics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09895-9

Mbonyiryivuze, A., Yadav, L. L., & Amadalo, M. M. (2021). Students' attitudes towards physics in Nine Years Basic Education in Rwanda. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21173

Moloi, M. J., & Motlhabane, A. T. (2023). Curriculum integration of physical sciencess, engineering science, technology subjects in relation to the technical sciences curriculum. South African Journal of Education, 43(2), Article a2209. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v43n2a2209

Nkadimeng, M., & Ankiewicz, P. (2022). The affordances of Minecraft Education as a game-based learning tool for atomic structure in junior high school science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09981-0

Orosz, G., Németh, V., Kovács, L., Somogyi, Z., & Korom, E. (2023). Guided inquiry-based learning in secondary-school chemistry classes: A case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00110A

Potgieter, M., Davidowitz, B., & Venter, E. J. (2008). Assessment of preparedness of first-year chemistry students: Development and application of an instrument for diagnostic and placement purposes. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-021-00174-1

Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. (2021). Examining the use of PhET simulations on students' attitudes and learning in general chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2247. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/10966

Scott, I., Yeld, N., & Hendry, J. (2007). Higher education monitor No.6: A case for improving teaching and learning in South African Higher Education. The Council on Higher Education, Pretoria.

Tong, T., Pi, F., Zheng, S., Zhong, Y., Lin, X., & Wei, Y. (2025). Exploring the effect of mathematics skills on student performance in physics problem-solving: A structural equation modeling analysis. Research in Science Education, 55(3), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10201-5

Umalusi, & Ecctis. (2022). International benchmarking of the National Senior Certificate: Physical sciencess. Umalusi Council for Quality Assurance in General and Further Education and Training.

Vilia, P. N., Candeias, A. A., Neto, A. S., Franco, M. G. S., & Melo, M. (2017). Academic achievement in physics-chemistry: The predictive effect of attitudes and reasoning abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1064. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01064

Zaaiman, H., Van der Flier, H., & Thijs, G. D. (2000). Selection as a contract to teach at the students’ level: Experiences from a South African mathematics and science foundation year. Higher Education, 40, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004020305088

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Nekhubvi, V. ., Pearce, R. ., Legodi, M. ., & Nhlapho, W. . (2026). Implications of Separate Marks for Physics and Chemistry in Grade 12 Results. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 25(2), 783–796. Retrieved from https://ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2732