Metacognitive Functioning in Students with Learning Disabilities or Difficulties: A Systematic Literature Review
Keywords:
metacognition; disability; difficulty; learning; systematic literature reviewAbstract
Dealing with the particularities of learners with learning disabilities or difficulties requires an understanding of the metacognitive functioning of these subjects. The aim of this work is to summarise the studies dealing with metacognitive functioning in students with learning disabilities or difficulties. For this reason, this research applied the systematic literature review method with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis) protocol. The research stages included identification, selection, eligibility and inclusion, so that studies must be indexed by Scopus between 2018 and 2023 and focus on metacognition in learners with learning disabilities or difficulties, the selection was carried out in two phases; an assessment of titles and abstracts, followed by a full analysis of the texts. The results reveal significant metacognitive disparities between students with learning disabilities and their typically developing peers. They use more surface strategies and fewer self-regulatory strategies, attach less importance to mastery, and avoid performance for fear of failure. They also have difficulty organising information, which affects their motivation. Interventions including cognitive and metacognitive strategies, techniques such as virtual reality and specific teaching improve learners’ ability to detect errors, self-regulate and develop essential skills in mathematics, reading and other areas. Future research should further explore these interventions to better understand their impact, taking into account aspects such as motivation and using rigorous methodological tools.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.23
References
Anache, A. A., & Resende, D. A. R. (2016). Caracterização da avaliação da aprendizagem nas salas de recursos multifuncionais para alunos com deficiência intelectual. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 21(66), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782016216630
Antshel, K. M., & Nastasi, R. (2008). Metamemory development in preschool children with ADHD. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(5), 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.06.007
American Psychiatric Association. (2019). What is specific learning disorder? https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/specific-learning-disorder/what-is-specific-learning-disorder
Bala, D. A., Kumari, D. M., & Meenu, M. (2023). Meta-cognition of secondary school students in relation to their educational adjustment. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.25215/1102.278
Baten, E., & Desoete, A. (2019). Metacognition and motivation in school-aged children with and without mathematical learning disabilities in Flanders. ZDM, 51(4), 679–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01024-6
Bonti, E., Kamari, A., Sofologi, M., Giannoglou, S., Porfyri, G.-N., Tatsiopoulou, P., Kougioumtzis, G., Efstratopoulou, M., & Diakogiannis, I. (2021). Similarities and differences in the learning profiles of adolescents with SLD and SLI in mathematics—a preliminary analysis. Brain Sciences, 11(7), 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11070850
Botsas, G. (2012). Metacognitive processes in reading comprehension of students with and without reading difficulties: Metacognition, motivation and affect involved. Thessaloniki, GR: University of Thessaloniki.
Boyle, J. R., Rosen, S. M., & Forchelli, G. (2016). Exploring metacognitive strategy use during note-taking for students with learning disabilities. Education, 44(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2014.929722
Branigan, H. E., & Donaldson, D. I. (2020). Teachers matter for metacognition: Facilitating metacognition in the primary school through teacher-pupil interactions. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100718
Cancino, M., & Tomicic, N. (2023). English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Reading Metacognition Awareness in Chilean Learners with Autism Spectrum Condition: An Exploratory Study. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language--TESL-EJ, 26(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26104a12
Cerezo, R., Fernández, E., Gómez, C., Sánchez-Santillán, M., Taub, M., & Azevedo, R. (2020). Multimodal protocol for assessing metacognition and self-regulation in adults with learning difficulties. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 2020(163), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3791/60331
Cornoldi, C., Carretti, B., Drusi, S., & Tencati, C. (2015). Improving problem solving in primary school students: The effect of a training programme focusing on metacognition and working memory. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12083
Dirgantoro, K. P. S. (2019). Analisis kesulitan mahasiswa PGSD pada mata kuliah geometri. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 3(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v3i1.1008
Drigas, A., Mitsea, E., & Skianis, C. (2022). Virtual reality and metacognition training techniques for learning disabilities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610170
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Flavell, J. H. (2002). Development of children’s knowledge about the mental world. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24(1), 15–23. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/pp/01650254.html
Forrest, S. (2022). Self-regulated learning in the IB diploma programme: A qualitative comparison of strategy use by IB Diploma students with learning difficulties and those with a history of high achievement. Journal of Research in International Education, 21(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/14752409221122009
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., & Schroeter, K. (2003). Enhancing third-grade student’ mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.306
García-Redondo, P., García, T., Areces, D., Núñez, J. C., & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Serious games and their effect improving attention in students with learning disabilities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142480
Geurten, M., & Lemaire, P. (2023). Domain-specific and domain-general metacognition for strategy selection in children with learning disabilities. Current Psychology, 42(17), 14297–14305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02733-8
Girli, A., & Öztürk, H. (2017). Metacognitive reading strategies in learning disability: relations between usage level, academic self-efficacy and self-concept. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 93–102.
Gomaa, O. M. K. (2016). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on science process skills and science self efficacy among first year prep students with learning disabilities. Educational Sciences, 5(3). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED572473.pdf
Gupta, P. K., & Sharma, D. V. (2017). Working memory and learning disabilities: a review. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.25215/0404.013
Kampylafka, C., Polychroni, F., & Antoniou, A.-S. (2023). Primary school students with reading comprehension difficulties and students with learning disabilities: exploring their goal orientations, classroom goal structures, and self-regulated learning strategies. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020078
Karabulut, A., Özmen, E. R., & Özkubat, U. (2020). Mathematical problem-solving processes of students with special needs: A cognitive strategy instruction model solve it. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(5), 405–416. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020562131
Khan, K., & Lal, P. (2023). Executive dysfunctions in different learning disabilities: A review. Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 19(2), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731342231179614
Kuracki, K., & D?u?niewska, A. (2023). Exam stress and the metacognitive strategies of reading in students with dyslexia: The role of motivational mechanisms and educational support. PLOS ONE, 18(11), e0294255. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294255
Lazarus, K. U., & Anwalimhobor, N. B. I. (2023). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies as predictors of reading comprehension achievement among students with learning disabilities in Nigeria. IJDS Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2023.010.01.07
Lingel, K., Lenhart, J., & Schneider, W. (2019). Metacognition in mathematics: Do different metacognitive monitoring measures make a difference? ZDM, 51(4), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01062-8
Lucangeli, D., Fastame, M. C., Pedron, M., Porru, A., Duca, V., Hitchcott, P. K., & Penna, M. P. (2019). Metacognition and errors: The impact of self-regulatory trainings in children with specific learning disabilities. ZDM, 51(4), 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01044-w
Maras, K., Gamble, T., & Brosnan, M. (2019). Supporting metacognitive monitoring in mathematics learning for young people with autism spectrum disorder: A classroom-based study. Autism, 23(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361317722028
Mastrothanais, K., Kalianou, M., Katsifi, S., & Zouganali, A. (2018). The use of metacognitive knowledge and regulation strategies of students with and without special learning difficulties. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 184–200. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328052528_The_Use_of_Metacognitive_Knowledge_and_Regulation_Strategies_of_Students_with_and_without_Special_Learning_Difficulties
Mitsea, E., Drigas, A., & Skianis, C. (2023). VR gaming for meta-skills training in special education: The role of metacognition, motivations, and emotional intelligence. Education Sciences, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070639
Özmen, E. R., & Özkubat, U. (2021). Investigation of Effects of cognitive strategies and metacognitive functions on mathematical problem- solving performance of students with or without learning disabilities. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.203
Padeliadu, S., Botsas, G., & Sideridis, G. (2002). Metacognitive awareness and reading strategies: Average and reading disabled students. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 14(0). https://doi.org/10.26262/istal.v14i0.6214
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Polo-Blanco, I., & González López, E. M. (2021). Teaching addition strategies to students with learning difficulties. Autism and Developmental Language Impairments, 6. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/23969415211045324
Rosdiana, L. A., Damaianti, V. S., Mulyati, Y., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2023). The role of metacognitive strategies in academic writing skills in higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.18
Schneider, W., & Lockl, K. (2002). 10 The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents. Applied Metacognition, 224.
Tewolde, F. G., Glosson, J., Messick, A., & Alloway, T. (2016). Learning strategies and metacognition in students with learning disabilities. Human Factors and Applied Psychology Student Conference. https://commons.erau.edu/hfap/hfap-2015/posters/20
Tops, W., Glatz, T., Premchand, A., Callens, M., & Brysbaert, M. (2020). Study strategies of first-year undergraduates with and without dyslexia and the effect of gender. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(3), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1703580
Tsampouris, G., & Sampedro Requena, B. E. (2022). Metacognitive strategies related with logical–mathematical thinking for adolescents with ADHD. Mathematics, 10(11), 1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10111810
Urban, K. (2023). Role of metacognition in early literacy development. In Development of key literacy skills in early childhood education (pp. 83–99). Peter Lang.
Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Definitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition. In Metacognition in science education (pp. 21–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6_2
Wang, A. Y., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Gilbert, J. K., Krowka, S., & Abramson, R. (2019). Embedding self-regulation instruction within fractions intervention for third graders with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(4), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419851750
Wang, L.-C., Li, X., & Chung, K. K. H. (2021). Relationships between test anxiety and metacognition in Chinese young adults with and without specific learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia, 71(1), 103-126
Wasida, M. R., & Hartono, H. (2018). Analisis kesulitan menyelesaikan soal model ujian nasional matematika dan self-efficacy siswa SMA. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.10060
Zheng, H., Dong, Y., Sun, Y., Yang, J., Yuan, C., Wang, J., & Dong, W. (2021). Effectiveness of metacognitive regulation intervention on attention-deficit–hyperactivity disorder students’ scientific ability and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 747961. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.747961
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bouargane Noureddine, Barebzi Abdellah, Raji Mohammed, Zeriouh Mohammed, El Azmy Jamal, Khadraoui Amine
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).