Digital Leadership and Professional Commitment to Enhance Teacher Innovativeness as a Priority Strategy
Keywords:
digital leadership; Rasch model; SmartPLS; teacher innovativeness; teacher professionAbstract
This research aimed to determine priority strategies for increasing teacher innovativeness in the digital era from digital leadership and professional commitment perspectives. The research employed a mixed methods research approach with four stages: theme exploration, model design, data collection, and analysis/product creation. The study population was teachers in Indonesia, and the sample comprised 623 teachers. The study results show that the priority strategy to increase the innovativeness of teachers is divided into two perspectives: digital leadership and professional commitment. Priority strategies from a digital leadership perspective are as follows: digital competitive and intelligent capabilities, digital communication skills, strengthening digital resilience, the ability of educational innovativeness, and monitoring school performance digitally. Priority strategies from a professional commitment perspective are as follows: involvement in the decision-making process, abilities in evaluation and reflection, improving self-competence, ability to prepare to overcome educational challenges, and teacher discipline in their duties. The results imply that academic institutions need to strengthen digital leadership and professional commitment to promote the innovativeness of teachers in the digital era.
https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.12
References
Abbu, H., Mugge, P., Gudergan, G., & Kwiatkowski, A. (2020). Digital leadership: Character and competency differentiates digitally mature organizations [Conference session]. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology, and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), June 15–17, 2020, Cardiff, UK. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE/ITMC49519.2020.9198576
Afsar, B., Masood, M., & Umrani, W. A. (2019). The role of job crafting and knowledge sharing on the effect of transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Personnel Review, 48(5), 1186–1208. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-04-2018-0133
Ahmady, S., Kohan, N., Bagherzadeh, R., Rakshhani, T., & Shahabi, M. (2018). Validity testing of classroom community scale in virtual environment learning: A cross sectional study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 36, 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2018.08.021
AL Jadidi, N. A. A. (2022). Job satisfaction among Early Childhood female teachers and its impact on professional commitment. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(3), 119?129. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.03.14
Alheet, A. F., Al Adwan, A., Areiqat, A. Y., Zamil, A. M. A., & Saleh, M. A. (2021). The effect of leadership styles on employees’ innovative work behavior. Management Science Letters, 11, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.8.010
Alzoraiki, M., Ahmad, A. R., Ateeq, A. A., Naji, G. M. A., Almaamari, Q., & Beshr, B. A. H. (2023). Impact of teachers’ commitment to the relationship between transformational leadership and sustainable teaching performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(5), Article 4620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054620
Andrich, D. (2010). Rasch models. International Encyclopedia of Education, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00258-X
Arham, A. F., Norizan, N. S., Arham, A. F., Hasbullah, N. N., Malan, I. N. B., & Alwi, S. (2023). Digital leadership in education: A meta-analysis review. In B. Alareeni, A. Hamdan, R. Khamis, & R. E. Khoury (Eds.), Digitalisation: Opportunities and challenges for business. ICBT 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (Vol. 621). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26956-1_79
Arifani, Y., Khaja, F. N. M., Suryanti, S., & Wardhono, A. (2019). The influence of blended in-service teacher professional training on EFL teacher creativity and teaching effectiveness. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(3), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2503-10
Asiyah, S., Wiyono, B. B., Hidayah, N., & Supriyanto, A. (2021). The effect of professional development, innovative work and work commitment on quality of teacher learning in elementary schools of Indonesia. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2021(95), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2021.95.13
Baharuddin, M. F., Masrek, M. N., & Shuhidan, S. M. (2020). Content validity of assessment instrument for innovative work behaviour of Malaysian school teachers. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(4), 1940–1946.
Bloem, V., & Salimi, N. (2022). Role of knowledge management processes within different stages of technological innovation: Evidence from biotechnology SMEs. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 21(4), 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2064352
Brunner, T. J. J., Schuster, T., & Lehmann, C. (2023). Leadership’s long arm: The positive influence of digital leadership on managing technology-driven change over a strengthened service innovation capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.988808
Budianto, S., Salim, U., Moko, W., & Khusniyah, N. (2023). Developing model of digital leadership for the new normal age [Symposium]. Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2022), December 5, 2022. Atlantis Press International BV. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-008-4_42
Buitrago, R., Salinas, J., & Boude, O. (2023). Validation of a model for the formalization of personal learning pathways through expert judgment. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(12), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v23i12.6283
Cai, Y., & Tang, R. (2021). School support for teacher innovation: Mediating effects of teacher self-efficacy and moderating effects of trust. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, Article 100854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100854
Cera, E., Cera, G., & Elezi, E. (2023). Commitment-based HRM and inbound open innovation in SMEs: The role of organizational trust and developmental culture. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-05-2023-0203
Chen, J., Zheng, W., & Jiang, B. (2022). The impact of moral leadership on physical education teachers’ innovation behavior: The role of identification with leader and psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1030245
Cheng, P., Tang, H., Dong, Y., Liu, K., Jiang, P., & Liu, Y. (2021). Knowledge mapping of research on land use change and food security: A visual analysis using CiteSpace and VOSviewer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), Article 13065. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413065
Dedering, K., & Pietsch, M. (2023). School leader trust and collective teacher innovativeness: On individual and organisational ambidexterity’s mediating role. Educational Review, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2195593
Espina-Romero, L., Noroño Sánchez, J. G., Rojas-Cangahuala, G., Palacios Garay, J., Parra, D. R., & Rio Corredoira, J. (2023). Digital leadership in an ever-changing world: A bibliometric analysis of trends and challenges. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17), Article 13129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713129
Firmansyah, F., Prasojo, L. D., Jaedun, A., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Transformational leadership effect on teacher performance in Asia: A meta-analysis. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(6), 2127–2146. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i6.7552
Hair, J., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
Hidayat, R., Hardhienata, S., Patras, Y. E., & Agustin, R. R. (2020). The effects of situational leadership and self-efficacy on the improvement of teachers’ work productivity using correlation analysis and SITOREM. COUNS-EDU: The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 5(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.23916/0020200525310
Hidayat, R., & Patras, Y. E. (2024a). Education transformation in Indonesia requires the implementation of differentiated learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(3), 1526–1536. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.27658
Hidayat, R., & Patras, Y. E. (2024b). Teacher innovativeness: The effect of self-efficacy, transformational leadership, and school climate. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(1), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202424547
Hidayat, R., & Patras, Y. E. (2024c). Digital leadership of school principals in Indonesia: Strategic interventions needed. Pedagogia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 16(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.55215/pedagogia.v16i1.10209
Hintermann, C., Edlinger, H., Fasching, M., & Jekel, T. (2021). ’I learned a lot about my classmates… ’: Exploring focus group discussions as learning environment to raise controversial issues in geography and economic education. European Journal of Geography, 12(4), 016–030. https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.c.hin.12.4.016.030
Hosseini, S., & Haghighi Shirazi, Z. R. (2021). Towards teacher innovative work behavior: A conceptual model. Cogent Education, 8(1), Article 1869364. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1869364
Huang, W., & Zhang, S. (2024). The impact of meaning in life on preservice teachers’ innovative behavior: The chain mediating effects of career calling and learning engagement. Current Psychology, 43(20), 18294–18306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05671-9
Huang, Y. J., Cheng, S., Yang, F. Q., & Chen, C. (2022). Analysis and visualization of research on resilient cities and communities based on VOSviewer. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(12), Article 7068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127068
Husni, Setiawan, I., Azis, A., Tantowie, T. A. J., & Rizal, S. S. (2020). Validity and reliability of multicultural competency instruments for Islamic education teachers. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 4634–4639.
Ismail, S., Omar, Z., Ismail, I. A., Alias, S. N., & Rami, A. A. M. (2021). Item generation stage: Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(4), 2503–2523. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.23
Jagadisen, M. S., Salamzadeh, Y., Farzad, F. S., Salamzadeh, A., & Palali?, R. (2022). Digital leadership and organizational capabilities in manufacturing industry: A study in Malaysian context. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 10(1), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v10i1.2237
Kang, J. H., Matusik, J. G., Kim, T. Y., & Phillips, J. M. (2016). Interactive effects of multiple organizational climates on employee innovative behavior in entrepreneurial firms: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(6), 628–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.08.002
Karakose, T., Polat, H., & Papadakis, S. (2021). Examining teachers’ perspectives on school principals’ digital leadership roles and technology capabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(23), Article 13448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313448
Khaola, P. P., & Oni, F. A. (2020). The influence of school principals’ leadership behaviour and act of fairness on innovative work behaviours amongst teachers. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 18, a1417. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajhrm.v18i0.1417
Khasanah, U., Kristiawan, M., & Tobari. (2019). Implementing principals’ academic supervision improves teachers’ professionalism in the state primary schools. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(8), 1107–1115.
Kigozi, E. (2020). Quality assurance practices applied in PTTCs: Listening to the student teachers’ voice through focus group discussion. Educational Process: International Journal, 9(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2020.91.2
Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M., & Martens, R. (2018). Teachers’ innovative behaviour: The importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 769?782. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306803
Lambriex-Schmitz, P., van der Klink, M. R., Beausaert, S., Bijker, M., & Segers, M. (2020). When innovation in education works: Stimulating teachers’ innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Training and Development, 24(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12175
Liu, C.-H. (2017). Creating competitive advantage: Linking perspectives of organization learning, innovation behavior and intellectual capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 66, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.06.013
López-Pérez, V. A., Ramírez-Correa, P. E., & Grandón, E. E. (2019). Innovativeness and factors that affect the information technology adoption in the classroom by primary teachers in Chile. Informatics in Education, 18(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.08
Luksyte, A., Unsworth, K. L., & Avery, D. R. (2018). Innovative work behavior and sex-based stereotypes: Examining sex differences in perceptions and evaluations of innovative work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2219
Malo-Juvera, V., Correll, P., & Cantrell, S. (2018). A mixed methods investigation of teachers’ self-efficacy for culturally responsive instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.003
Melendez, S. I., Carbone, K., & Searle, M. (2022). Michael D. Fetters. (2020). The mixed methods research workbook: Activities for designing implementing, and publishing projects [Book review]. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 36(3), 414–416. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.73686
Middleton, L., & Hall, H. (2021). Workplace information literacy: A bridge to the development of innovative work behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 77(6), 1343?1363. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2021-0065
Mihardjo, L. W. W., Sasmoko, Alamsyah, F., & Elidjen. (2019). The influence of digital leadership on innovation management based on dynamic capability: Market orientation as a moderator. Management Science Letters, 9(7), 1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.3.018
Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for good measurements in research: Validity and reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University, 17(4), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.26458/1746
Montani, F., Torres, C., Ferreira, M. C., Mendonça, H., Silva, A. J., Courcy, F., & Dagenais-Desmarais, V. (2021). Self-image goals, compassionate goals and innovative work behavior: The role of organizational support for innovation across countries. Journal of Business Research, 137, 588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.072
Morad, S., Ragonis, N., & Barak, M. (2021). The validity and reliability of a tool for measuring educational innovative thinking competencies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, Article 103193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103193
Navaridas-Nalda, F., Clavel-San Emeterio, M., Fernández-Ortiz, R., & Arias-Oliva, M. (2020). The strategic influence of school principal leadership in the digital transformation of schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 112, Article 106481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106481
Nesje, K. (2023). When the education emphasises empathy: Does it predict differences in professional commitment between male and female students in caring education? Tertiary Education and Management, 29, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-023-09116-z
Nguyen, T. P. L., Nguyen, K. N., Do, T. D., & Nguyen, T. T. M. (2019). Knowledge sharing and innovative work behavior: The case of Vietnam. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 7(4), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2019.5.001
Noor, I. H. M., Herlinawati, & Sofyaningrum, E. (2020). The academic supervision of the school principal: A case in Indonesia. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(4), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.36941/JESR-2020-0067
Nurabadi, A., Irianto, J., Bafadal, I., Juharyanto, J., Gunawan, I., & Adha, M. A. (2021). The effect of instructional, transformational and spiritual leadership on elementary school teachers’ performance and students’ achievements. Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 40(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.35641
Pandey, A., Gupta, V., & Gupta, R. K. (2019). Spirituality and innovative behaviour in teams: Examining the mediating role of team learning. IIMB Manajemen Review, 31, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2019.03.013
Phuong, N. D., Quynh, P. H., & Hien, H. T. T. (2021). Supportive work environment and teacher’s innovative work behaviour: The mediating role of informal learning in Vietnam. Review of Economics and Finance, 19, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.55365/1923.X2021.19.10
Pilav-Veli?, A., Cerne, M., Trkman, P., Wong, S. I., & Abaz, A. K. (2021). Digital or innovative: Understanding “digital literacy – practice – innovative work behavior” chain. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 16(1), 107?119. https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2021-0009
Prasetya, A. B., Purnama, D. S., & Prasetyo, F. W. (2020). Validity and reliability of the Perceived Stress Scale with RASCH model. PSIKOPEDAGOGIA Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 8(2), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.12928/psikopedagogia.v8i2.17903
Ramli, A. F., & Rasul, M. S. (2024). Issues and challenges in the implementation of professional development programs for design and technology teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(7), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.7.4
Ratnaningsih, I. Z., Prasetyo, A. R., & Prihatsanti, U. (2016). Predicting innovative behavior among employees in a manufacturing company: The role of psychological capital. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 31(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v31i2.567
Rivera, L. (Ed.). (2015). Structural equation modelling (SEM): Concepts, application and misconceptions. Nova Publishers.
Saputra, N., Nugroho, R., Aisyah, H., & Karneli, O. (2021). Digital skill during Covid-19: Effects of digital leadership and digital collaboration. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 19(2), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2021.019.02.04
Schipper, T. M., de Vries, S., Goei, S. L., & van Veen, K. (2020). Promoting a professional school culture through lesson study? An examination of school culture, school conditions, and teacher self-efficacy. Professional Development in Education, 46(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1634627
Song, Y., Tian, Q.t., & Kwan, H. K. (2022). Servant leadership and employee voice: A moderated mediation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 37(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-02-2020-0077
Suhayat, J., Suwatno, S., & Buchdadi, A. D. (2023). PLS-SEM model: Explore factors affecting teacher performance. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1612a
Suparno, S., Firstianto, A., Nurjanah, S., Disman, D., & Widhiastuti, R. (2022). Student creativity development: The role of teacher innovation and intrapreneurial school culture. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 11(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.18488/73.v11i1.3246
Susilawati, D. M., Suryanto, & Windijarto. (2021). Transforming the digital leadership to improve public service performance in the COVID-19 outbreak. Economic Annals-XXI, 188(3–4), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V188-04
Swart, C., Pottas, L., & Maree, D. (2021). Servant school leadership and organisational climate in South African private schools. Education Research International, 2021, Article 8568889. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8568889
Umah, E. C., Imron, A., Hadi, S., & Praherdhiono, H. (2023). Madrasah principal digital leadership innovation in digital learning transformation. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 17(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n3-025
van Zile-Tamsen, C. (2017). Using Rasch analysis to inform rating scale development. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 922–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9448-0
Villalonga-Olives, E., Kawachi, I., & Rodríguez, A. M. (2021). Rasch model of the bridging social capital questionnaire. SSM – Population Health, 14, Article 100791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100791
Wang, G., Strong, M., Zhang, S., & Liu, K. (2021). Preservice teacher professional commitment: A conceptual model and literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, Article 103373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103373
Wang, P., & Hou, Y. (2023). How does commitment affect employee’s innovative behavior? A time-lagged study. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231216568
Wasono, L. W., & Furinto, A. (2018). The effect of digital leadership and innovation management for incumbent telecommunication company in the digital disruptive era. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i2.29.13142
Woldearegay, A. G. (2021). Predictive model of organizational justice, job satisfaction, and commitment: The context of the state media sector in the Ethiopian federation. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), Article 1930866. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1930866
Yaakop, N., Koh, D., & Yasin, R. M. (2023). A content validation of focus group discussions based on need analysis in a physical education training module for primary school teachers. Retos, 50, 1115–1122. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v50.100191
Yan, X. Q., Zhou, Y. Y., Zhang, K., & Cui, G. Y. (2023). Perceived teacher enthusiasm and professional commitment: The mediating role of boredom and learning engagement. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 16, 1149–1163. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S400137
Ying, J. (2023). Education for development: Professional commitments and practices among Tibetan teachers in northwest China. Educational Review, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2023.2170331
Yusof, M. R., Yaakob, M. F. M., & Ibrahim, M. Y. (2019). Digital leadership among school leaders in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(9), 1481–1485. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.i8221.078919
Zainal, M. A., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2019). Factors influencing teachers’ innovative behaviour: A systematic review. Creative Education, 10(12), 2869–2886. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012213
Zohair, A. Z. H., Shooroq, M., Najwa, D., & Hytham, B. M. I. (2021). High school principals’ situational leadership and its relationship with teachers’ achievement motivation. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(4), 1027–1041. https://doi.org/10.13187/EJCED.2021.4.1027
Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research: Instruments, validity, reliability and reporting findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254–262. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262
Zupancic, T., Verbeke, J., Herneoja, A., & Achten, H. (2017). Competences for digital leadership in architecture [Conference session]. ShoCK! – Sharing Computational Knowledge! – Proceedings of the 35th eCAADe Conference, September 20–22, 2017, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy (Vol. 1, pp. 289–296). https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2017.1.289
Žydži?nait?, V., & Arce, A. (2021). Being an innovative and creative teacher: Passiondriven professional duty. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.14087
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rais Hidayat, Yuyun Elizabeth Patras, Yuli Muliyawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All articles published by IJLTER are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives 4.0 International License (CCBY-NC-ND4.0).