Performance Evaluation for Educators in Higher Education from Bibliometric Analysis Views

Authors

  • Nor Azarif Sofia Hussain
  • Mohd Effendi @ Ewan Mohd Matore
  • Mohd Izham Mohd Hamzah

Keywords:

performance evaluation; educator; bibliometric analysis; Higher Education Assessment; Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Abstract

Educator performance evaluation in higher education is an evolving process that is shaped by pedagogical advances and institutional needs. This study uses bibliometric analysis to explore research trends and emerging themes in educator performance evaluation. Using Scopus data, a comprehensive analysis of 1,173 publications from 2000 to 2024 was conducted, examining the evolution from traditional student evaluation to competency-based frameworks that integrate artificial intelligence and data-driven methodologies. Key findings indicate a shift toward technology-enhanced evaluation, integrating AI-driven analytics and real-time feedback. The study highlights key contributors, including leading countries, institutions and authors, providing insights into global research collaborations. The analysis identified five dominant research clusters: technology-driven evaluation systems, competency-based faculty evaluation, policy frameworks, faculty evaluation in medical education, and post-pandemic teaching evaluation. The increasing use of machine learning, data mining and performance indicators reflects a shift toward structured and objective evaluation methods. However, challenges such as implicit bias, inconsistent rubrics and an overreliance on quantitative metrics persist. Findings from this study offer valuable insights for policymakers, administrators, and educators seeking to refine evaluation frameworks in alignment with emerging trends. The research underlines the necessity for a hybrid evaluation method that balances quantitative performance measurements with qualitative evaluation strategies, ensuring a thorough understanding of teaching efficacy. For higher education evaluation systems to be more equitable, dependable, and inclusive, future studies should investigate different approaches, interdisciplinary evaluation frameworks, and the moral ramifications of AI-driven performance evaluations.

https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.5.15

References

Abubakar, U., Ogunlade, O. O., & Ibrahim,H. A. (2024). The in?uence of technology-integratedcurriculum resources on student engagement and aca-demic achievement in higher education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(2), 1208-1223. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.02.014

Aguinis, H. (2019). Performance management for dummies. Wiley.

Alshaikhi, T., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2025). Enhancing teacher competence in differentiated instruction for English language learners with disabilities: A professional development intervention. World Journal of English Language, 15(1), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n1p101

Altassan, M. A. (2022). Advancing sustainable development through performance appraisal systems: Critiques, innovations, and future trends. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development, 19, 1160–1178. https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2023.19.107

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bennett, R. E. (2025). Rethinking equity and assessment through opportunity to learn. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2025.2462549

Chen, X., & Chen, R. (2024). Examining the influence of the performance of mobile devices on teaching quality based on the technological acceptance mode. Library Hi Tech, 42(2), 670–695. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-12-2021-0489

Chen, Y., Pan, Y., Liu, H., Wu, H., & Deng, G. (2023). Efficiency analysis of Chinese universities with shared inputs: An aggregated two-stage network DEA approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 90, 101728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101728

Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Creating a comprehensive system for evaluating and supporting effective teaching. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu

Do, Q. H., Tran, V. T., & Tran, T. T. (2024). Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Heliyon, 10(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30772

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W.M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Eun Joo Park, & Sanghee Lee. (2022). Creative thinking in the architecture design studio: Bibliometric analysis and literature review. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12060828

Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Firmansyah, J., Suhandi, A., Setiawan, A., & Permanasari, A. (2022). Evaluation of virtual workspace laboratory: Cloud communication and collaborative work on project-based laboratory. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 15(3), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2022.150301

Hao, H. (2024). The relationship between faculty emotional intelligence and student engagement in blended learning environments. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 11(2), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2024.112.159.167

Harzing, A. W., & Alakangas, S. (2016). Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics, 106, 787-804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5

Hou, W. (2024). The establishment of a performance evaluation model using education informatization to evaluate teacher morality construction in colleges and universities. Open Computer Science, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/comp-2023-0101

Janavi, E., & Abdi, S. (2024). Faculty members’ performance appraisal system: A bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 22(3), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijism.2024.2013962.1281

Jin, R., Gao, S., Cheshmehzangi, A., & Aboagye-Nimo, E. (2018). A holistic review of off-site construction literature published between 2008 and 2018. In Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.195

Khan, F. U., & Badulescu, D. (2025). Sustainability pressures unveiled: Navigating the role of organizational sustainable culture in promoting sustainability performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 17(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su17031322

Liu, C. (2024). Automating student assessment using digital data to improve education management effectiveness in higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1885–1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11898-z

Liu, Y., & Chen, D. (2024). Design of a virtual reality serious game for experiencing the colors of Dunhuang frescoes. Heritage Science, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-024-01477-x

Mahmud, A., Susilowati, N., & Sari, P. N. (2024). Assessment methods and learning styles for learning satisfaction: the role of self-efficacy. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(6), 515-526. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i6.29757

Mamatha, H. K., Sridhar, R., & Somanatha, B. (2024). Multicriteria decision analysis tool for faculty performance evaluation in higher education institutions. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6(7), 0-0. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024118

Masdoki, M., Din, R., & Mohd Matore, M. E. E. (2021). Teaching 4.0 competency in higher learning institutions: A systematic mapping review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(10), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.10.12

Maturana, M., et al. (2025). Exploring the role of role-theoretical concepts: Determining dimensionality of difficulty in cross-occupational collaboration. Vocations and Learning, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-025-09361-w

Mohd Matore, M. E. E., Khairani, A. Z., Mohamad, S. M., Alias, N., & Mohd Mokhtar, E. R. (2018). The influence of intellectual quotient (IQ), emotional quotient (EQ) and spiritual quotient (SQ) against adversity quotient (AQ) on polytechnic students in Malaysia. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 13(Special Issue on ICETVESS 2017), 83–91.

Mohd Matore, M. E. E., Zainal, M. A., Mohd Noh, M. F., Khairani, A. Z., & Abd Razak, N. (2021). The development and psychometric assessment of Malaysian Youth Adversity Quotient Instrument (MY-AQi) by combining Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis. IEEE Access, 9, 13314–13329. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3050311

Mohd Noh, M. F., & Mohd Matore, M. E. E. (2022). Rater severity differences in English language as a second language speaking assessment based on rating experience, training experience, and teaching experience through many-faceted Rasch measurement analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 941084. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941084

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213-228.

Musid, N. A., Matore, M. E. E. M., & Hamid, A. H. A. (2024). A scoping review on mapping the digital leadership constructs for educational settings: What we can learn? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(1), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.26760

Pifer, M. J., Logsdon, M. C., Ibarra, M., & Gardner, K. (2024). Advancing scholarly excellence at midcareer: The influence of exceptional others on faculty professional growth. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 13(2), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-08-2023-0076

Rahimi, Z., Badiyepeymaiejahromi, Z., & Taghizadeganzadeh, M. (2024). 360-degree evaluation of nursing students' performance. Shiraz E Medical Journal, 25(11), e148872. https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-148872

Rogers, J. K. B., Mercado, T. C. R., & Decano, R. S. (2025). Moodle interactions and academic performance: Educational data mining in a Philippine university. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(1), 542–550. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i1.21549

Sabharwal, R., & Miah, S. J. (2024). The role of social media in spreading the culture of volunteer work among university students. Studies in Media and Communication, 12(4), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v12i4.6941

Sabtu, S. H., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2024). Systematic literature review on the implementation of the Six Sigma approach in education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(1), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.26196

Sovey, S., Osman, K., & Mohd Matore, M. E. E. (2022). Rasch analysis for disposition levels of computational thinking instrument among secondary school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(3), Article em2088. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11794

Székely, F., & Knirsch, M. (2005). Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, 23(6), 628–647.

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Velázquez, M. del R. H., Macias, M. L. C., Soraida, Q. C. L., & Figueroa, M. S. Q. (2024). Evaluation of Competencies in Nursing Students. a Cross-Sectional Study. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 18(8), e08219. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n8-167

Ye, Y., Zhu, H., Cui, T., Yu, R., Zhang, L., & Xiong, H. (2024). University evaluation through graduate employment prediction: An influence-based graph autoencoder approach. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 36(11), 7255–7267. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2024.3402234

Zaabalawi, R.S., Zaabalawi, J. Portfolios versus exams: a study to gauge the better student assessment tool. Lang Test Asia 14, 28 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00296-y

Zheng, Y., & Sun, C. (2022). Construction scheme of quantitative assessment of college teachers' performance based on big data analysis. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, Article 8373164. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8373164

Zhu, J. (2024). Key challenges and countermeasures: A review of undergraduate teaching of neurology in outpatient settings. BMC Medical Education, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06601-w

Zhu, Z., & Chang, Y. (2025). The influence of work stress on the work performance of university teachers in Zhejiang Province, China: The mediating role of work happiness. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 15(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2025-0004

Zupic, I., & ?ater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Hussain, N. A. S. ., Matore, M. E. @ E. M. ., & Hamzah, M. I. M. . (2025). Performance Evaluation for Educators in Higher Education from Bibliometric Analysis Views. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(5), 283–303. Retrieved from http://ijlter.myres.net/index.php/ijlter/article/view/2317

Issue

Section

Articles